Affiliation:
1. University of West Alabama , USA
2. Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, International Educational College , Guangdzu, Guangdong , China
Abstract
Summary
This article examined a variant of the Capability Maturity Model integrated (CMMi) through the lens of advertising process improvement. The population and sample were taken from a national array of U.S. marketing organizations. Using ANOVA, a 0.05 significance level, and a stratification of service marketing organizations versus product marketing organizations, the study showed a statistically significant difference (F(1, 304) = 4.03; p = 0.04; ω
2 = 0.00) regarding the hypothesis representing the notion that processes were potentially sporadic, chaotic, and ad hoc. This notion corresponded to the first maturity level of the examined process maturity framework. With respect to the Likert-scale data representing the first maturity level, the successive means analysis showed that both service marketing firms (M = 2.99) and product marketing firms (M = 2.74) reported neutrality regarding whether processes were deemed sporadic, chaotic, and ad hoc. Thus, the respondents perceived no evidence of the first maturity level among the queried work settings. Future studies may examine different stratifications of marketing firms (e.g., for-profit versus non-profit; domestic versus international; and so on) to better explore the proposed advertising maturity model.
Reference43 articles.
1. 1. Bagad, V. S. (2008). Management science. Pune, Indie: Technical Publications Pune.
2. 2. Bahr, N. J. (2014). System safety engineering and risk assessment: A practical approach. (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
3. 3. Battista, C. & Massimiliano, M. S. (2013). The logistic maturity model: Application to a fashion company. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 5, 1–11.
4. 4. Broderick, A., Garry, T., & Beasley, M. (2010). The need for adaptive processes of benchmarking in small business-to-business services. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25 (5), 324–337.
5. 5. Carcary, M. (2013). IT risk management: A Capability Maturity Model perspective. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 16 (1), 3–13.