The Principle of Direct Effect in Criminal Law: Theory and Practice

Author:

Gruodytė Edita1,Milčiuvienė Saulė2,Palionienė Neringa3

Affiliation:

1. 1 tenure professor in public law department and vice-dean for research at Faculty of law of Vytautas Magnus University , Kaunas , Lithuania .

2. 2 (Ph.D) is an associated professor at the Law faculty of Vytautas Magnus University , Kaunas , Lithuania .

3. 3 (Ph.D) is a lecturer in at the Law faculty of Vytautas Magnus University , Kaunas , Lithuania .

Abstract

Summary The meaning of the general principles of EU law has been broadly developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union; however, for many years it had only limited competence in deciding criminal cases. The principle of direct effect is important for ensuring the efficient functioning of EU law. The aim of this research is to find out if and how this principle affects criminal justice. To reach this objective, the researchers examine how the substance and content of the principle, through the doctrine and the judgments of Court of Justice of the European Union, can influence national criminal law and criminal procedure. Afterwards, the actual impact of EU law on national criminal law is evaluated, taking Lithuania as an example. The analysis reveals that direct application of directives in material criminal law is highly unlikely, while in criminal procedural, law such a possibility is real if EU norms are clear, unconditional, and precise.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Political Science and International Relations

Reference59 articles.

1. BIONDI, A., EECKHOUT, P., RIPLEY, S. (eds). EU After Lisbon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 1–456.

2. Case 26/62, NV Algemene Transport—En Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v. Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration, ECLI:EU:C:1963:1.

3. Case C-105/14, Tarrico and Others (Tarrico I), ECLI:EU:C:2015:555.

4. Case C-14/86, Pretore di Salo v X, ECLI:EU:C:1987:275.

5. Case C-152/84, M.H. Marshall v. Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching), ECLI:EU:C:1986:84.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3