Improving Products Considering Customer Expectations and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
Author:
Pacana Andrzej1ORCID, Siwiec Dominika1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Rzeszow University of Technology ; Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics , Rzeszow , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
Dynamically identifying key product changes is a challenge for enterprises. It is even more complicated if companies strive for the sustainable development of their activities. Therefore, the aim of the article was to develop a method to help predict the direction of product improvement, taking into account its quality level and environmental impact during the life cycle (LCA). The method was based on the design phase of LCA and the process of obtaining and processing customer expectations. Techniques supporting the developed method were: a questionnaire, a seven-point Likert scale, a standardised list of criteria for assessing the product life cycle, the WSM method, and a scale of relative states. The product analysis was carried out according to modified criteria states, which were evaluated according to: i) customer satisfaction (quality criteria), ii) environmental impact of LCA (environmental criteria), and iii) importance of quality and environmental criteria for customers. The originality of the method is to support the product improvement process to make it environmentally friendly within LCA and, at the same time, satisfactory to customers in terms of quality. The method will be used mainly by SMEs that want to initially predict the environmental impact of a product, including taking into account customer expectations.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference47 articles.
1. Alejandrino, C., Mercante, I.T., Bovea, M.D., 2022. Combining O-LCA and O-LCC to support circular economy strategies in organizations: Methodology and case study, J Clean Prod, 336, 130365. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130365 2. Ali, A., Hafeez, Y., Hussain, S., Yang, S., 2020. Role of Requirement Prioritization Technique to Improve the Quality of Highly-Configurable Systems, IEEE Access, 8, 27549–27573. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2971382 3. Borkowski, S., Ulewicz, R., Selejdak, J., Konstanciak, M., Klimecka-Tatar, D. 2012. The use of 3x3 matrix to evaluation of ribbed wire manufacturing technology, METAL 2012 - Conference Proceedings, 21st International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, 1722–1728 4. Calado, E.A., Leite, M., Silva, A., 2019. Integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) in the early phases of aircraft structural design: an elevator case study, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 24, 2091–2110, DOI: 10.1007/s11367-019-01632-8 5. Chen, C.-H., Khoo, L.P., Yan, W., 2003. Evaluation of multicultural factors from elicited customer requirements for new product development, Res Eng Des, 14, 119–130, DOI: 10.1007/s00163-003-0032-6
|
|