Exploring Mechanisms of Recruitment and Recruitment Cooperation in Respondent Driven Sampling

Author:

Lee Sunghee1,Ong Ai Rene1,Elliott Michael1

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Social Research , University of Michigan , 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48104, U.S.A.

Abstract

Abstract Respondent driven sampling (RDS) is a sampling method designed for hard-to-sample groups with strong social ties. RDS starts with a small number of arbitrarily selected participants (“seeds”). Seeds are issued recruitment coupons, which are used to recruit from their social networks. Waves of recruitment and data collection continue until reaching a sufficient sample size. Under the assumptions of random recruitment, with-replacement sampling, and a sufficient number of waves, the probability of selection for each participant converges to be proportional to their network size. With recruitment noncooperation, however, recruitment can end abruptly, causing operational difficulties with unstable sample sizes. Noncooperation may void the recruitment Markovian assumptions, leading to selection bias. Here, we consider two RDS studies: one targeting Korean immigrants in Los Angeles and in Michigan; and another study targeting persons who inject drugs in Southeast Michigan. We explore predictors of coupon redemption, associations between recruiter and recruits, and details within recruitment dynamics. While no consistent predictors of noncooperation were found, there was evidence that coupon redemption of targeted recruits was more common among those who shared social bonds with their recruiters, suggesting that noncooperation is more likely to be a feature of recruits not cooperating, rather than recruiters failing to distribute coupons.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference39 articles.

1. Abramovitz, D., E.M. Volz, S.A. Strathdee, T.L. Patterson, A. Vera, and S.D. Frost. 2009. “Using Respondent Driven Sampling in a hidden Population at Risk of HIV Infection: Who Do HIV-positive Recruiters Recruit?” Sexually Transmitted Diseases 36(12): 750–756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181b0f311.

2. American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2016. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 9th edition. AAPOR. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed September 2019).

3. Bostwick, W.B., T.L. Hughes, and B. Everett. 2015. “Health behavior, status, and outcomes among a community-based sample of lesbian and bisexual women.” LGBT Health 2(2): 121–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0074.

4. CDC. 2015. National HIV Behavioral Surveillance: Injection Drug Use – Round 4 (NHBS-IDU4): Operations Manual. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics/systems/nhbs/NHBS-IDU4-Operations-Manual-2015.pdf (accessed April 2018).

5. Gile, K.J. and M.S. Handcock. 2010. “Respondent-driven sampling: an assessment of current methodology.” Sociological Methodology 40(1): 286 – 327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01223.x.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3