A Validation of R-Indicators as a Measure of the Risk of Bias using Data from a Nonresponse Follow-Up Survey

Author:

Roberts Caroline1,Vandenplas Caroline2,Herzing Jessica M.E.1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Social Sciences , University of Lausanne , Bâtiment Géopolis, Quartier Mouline, CH-1015 Lausanne , Switzerland .

2. Consulting, Chemin du Cyclotron 6, 1348 Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve , Belgium .

Abstract

Abstract R-indicators are increasingly used as nonresponse bias indicators. However, their effectiveness depends on the auxiliary data used in their estimation. Because of this, it is not always clear for practitioners what the magnitude of the R-indicator implies for bias in other survey variables, or how adjustment on auxiliary variables will affect it. In this article, we investigate these potential limitations of R-indicators in a case study using data from the Swiss European Social Survey (ESS5), which included a nonresponse follow-up (NRFU) survey. First, we analyse correlations between estimated response propensities based on auxiliary data from the register-based sampling frame, and responses to survey questions also included in the NRFU. We then examine how these relate to bias detected by the NRFU, before and after adjustment, and to predictions of the risk of bias provided by the R-indicator. While the results lend support for the utility of R-indicators as summary statistics of bias risk, they suggest a need for caution in their interpretation. Even where auxiliary variables are correlated with target variables, more bias in the former (resulting in a larger R-indicator) does not automatically imply more bias in the latter, nor does adjustment on the former necessarily reduce bias in the latter.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference58 articles.

1. AAPOR, American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 9th edition.

2. Bethlehem, J.G. 2002. “Weighting Non-response Adjustment Based on Auxiliary Information.” In Survey Non-response, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 41–54. New York: Wiley.

3. Beullens, K. and G. Loosveldt. 2012. “Should High response Rates Really be the Primary Objective?” Survey Practice 5(3): 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2012-0019.

4. Beullens, K., G. Loosveldt, C. Vandenplas, and I. Stoop. 2018. “Response Rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?” Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2018-00003.

5. Brick, J.M. and M.E. Jones. 2008. “Propensity to respond and nonresponse bias.” METRON – International Journal of Statistics, LXVI(1), 51–73.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3