The influence of closed or open grip type during a pull-up test to exhaustion

Author:

Bartolo Luca Di1ORCID,Ficarra Salvatore1ORCID,Polizzi Davide1,Drid Patrik2ORCID,Paoli Antonio3ORCID,Palma Antonio1ORCID,Thomas Ewan1ORCID,Bianco Antonino1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1 Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy

2. 2 Faculty of Sport and Physical Education , University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

3. 3 Department of Biomedical Sciences , University of Padova , Padova , Italy

Abstract

Abstract Study aim: The aim of this study is to assess whether a closed (CG) or open grip (OC) can influence the maximum number of repetitions during the pull-up test to exhaustion. Material and methods: Ninety-five physically active males (age 23.5 ± 6.2 years, body mass 69 ± 7.9 kg, height 174.0 ± 6.4 cm, BMI 22.9 ± 2.2) randomly performed the pull-up test to exhaustion twice, once for each type of grip, one week apart. Results: No significant difference (p = 0.092) was found between the maximum number of repetitions performed with the OG (14.2 ± 5.7) or the CG (13.9 ± 5.9). Spearman’s correlation showed no significant association between participants’ body mass and the number of repetitions (r = 0.128, p = 0.22 for OG; r = 0.157, p = 0.13 for CG). Conclusions: According to our results, the grip is not relevant in the determination of the performance during a pull-up test to exhaustion. Thus, using one grip instead of another may be recommended independently of performance needs. Grip type may be adapted considering the practised sport, and specific athletic requirements, as well as individual preference.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3