An Examination of Work Conditions and Well-Being of Slovene Train Drivers
Author:
Murko Danica1, Khawaja Sarwar2, Qureshi Fayyaz Hussain2
Affiliation:
1. Ministry of Infrastructure , Slovenia 2. Oxford Business College , 65 George Street , Oxford , United Kingdom
Abstract
Abstract
Background and purpose
While the occupation of a train driver can be likened to other transportation professions like truck or bus drivers, it is essential to note that there are distinct hazards exclusive to this role that have a notable impact on the mental and physical well-being of train drivers. The study aims to define personal characteristics, work organisation and work characteristics, professional development and work in general in connection with risk factors among employees who perform the work tasks of train drivers in railway transport.
Methodology
The study on train drivers in Slovenia was conducted with 179 participants, representing 13.3% of the total population of train drivers. The sample was predominantly male and varied in age, most hailing from the Podravska region. The OPSA digital tool was used to analyse risk factors and gauge psychosocial stress across 17 areas, using a questionnaire split into two sections. Data was collected through online and physical surveys, with voluntary and anonymous participation.
Results
The study found that the personal characteristics of train drivers do not significantly impact their perception of workplace workload. While professional development factors negatively influenced workload perception, the impact was not statistically significant. However, general work characteristics strongly impact how train drivers perceive their workload. These findings suggest that interventions should focus on modifying general work characteristics to improve train drivers’ work conditions.
Conclusions
These findings have important implications for the railway industry. They suggest that interventions aimed at improving the work conditions of train drivers should focus on modifying general work characteristics rather than targeting personal characteristics or professional development factors. Future research should explore these relationships and develop strategies to mitigate the identified risk factors.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference32 articles.
1. Balfe, N., Crowley, K., Smith, B., & Longo, L. (2017). Estimation of train driver workload: extracting task-load measures from on-train-data-recorders. In Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications: First International Symposium, H-WORKLOAD 2017, Dublin, Ireland, June 28-30, 2017, Revised Selected Papers 1 (pp. 106-119). Springer International Publishing. 2. Carnall, L. A., Mason, O., O’Sullivan, M., & Patton, R. (2022). Psychosocial hazards, posttraumatic stress disorder, complex posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety in the UK rail industry: A cross- sectional study. Journal of traumatic stress, 35(5), 1460-1471. doi: 10.1002/jts.22846. 3. Chang, H. L., & Ju, L. S. (2008). Effect of consecutive driving on accident risk: a comparison between passenger and freight train driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(6), 1844-1849. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.07.009 4. Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian journal of clinical psychology, 24, 25–41. 5. Doroga, C., & Băban, A. (2013). Traumatic exposure and posttraumatic symptoms for train drivers involved in railway incidents. Clujul Medical, 86(2), 144.
|
|