Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Economics and Administration , Masaryk University , Czech Republic
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Innovation policy supports innovation in companies, as it is crucial for economic, social and environmental development.
Objectives: The research aims to verify whether companies that have received public support for innovation are experiencing turnover growth.
Methods/Approach: The research is carried out on the example of the Czech Innovation Programme, and the analysis included 276 projects in the manufacturing industry. The study compares the turnover of enterprises one year before receiving the aid and two years after the granting. The analysis is performed regarding the size of companies, industries and regions.
Results: When the companies are assessed at the median level, the largest turnover growth was found in the category of small enterprises. Regarding industry, the largest increase was recorded in NACE sections 22, 27, 26, 29 and 30. The lowest increase in turnover was recorded for enterprises in sections 21, 23, 24 and 28. Differences in turnover growth were also observed across regions.
Conclusions: Providing support for innovation contributes to the growth of turnover. A larger share of public aid should be allocated to the category of small and medium-sized enterprises and knowledge-intensive industries.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Information Systems,Management Information Systems
Reference44 articles.
1. 1. API – Business and Innovation Agency (2021), „General Information on OP EIC“, available at https://www.agentura-api.org/en/op-pik-obecne (20 April 2021)
2. 2. Arrow, K. J. (1962), “Economic welfare and the allocations of resources of invention“, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 609-626.10.1515/9781400879762-024
3. 3. Arza, V., Lopez, E. (2021), „Obstacles affecting innovation in small and medium enterprises: Quantitative analysis of the Argentinean manufacturing sector“, Research Policy, Vol. 50 No. 9, pp. 1039-1052.10.1016/j.respol.2021.104324
4. 4. BEIS (2017), “The impact of public support for innovation on firm outcomes“, BEIS Research Paper, No. 3, BEIS, Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, London.
5. 5. Bianchini, S., Llerena, P., Martino, R. (2019), “The impact of R&D subsidies under different institutional frameworks“, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 50 No. September 2019, pp. 65-78.10.1016/j.strueco.2019.04.002
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献