Abstract
Abstract
In 2019 artist Layla Khoo created and installed a participatory artwork at Nunnington Hall, a property owned by the National Trust, UK. The artwork, named Change in Attitudes, was a response to the taxidermy collection of hunting trophies displayed on site, all shot and collected by the last owner of the house, Colonel Ronald Fife. The work sought to encourage visitors to consider their thoughts on this difficult part of the collection, both in its historical context and in light of current societal norms, by inviting them to participate with the artwork through choice-making. This case study first analyzes the impact of this work on visitor engagement at the site, both in the participation methods intended by the artist and in the unexpected participation methods employed by the visitors as the installation evolved. The questions raised by this case study are then considered, as well as the research currently under way which seeks to answer them.
Publisher
Det Kgl. Bibliotek/Royal Danish Library
Reference25 articles.
1. Alexander, M. (2000). Do visitors get it? A sweatshop exhibit and visitors’ comments. The Public Historian, 22(3), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/3379580
2. Arts Council England (2024). Impact and insight toolkit. Retrieved 20/04/2024 from https://impactandinsight.co.uk/
3. Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso.
4. Blokland, A. (2019). Participation at the Van Gogh Museum: A balancing act [Review]. International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, 12(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835–2014/CGP/v12i01/19–38
5. Cartiere, C., & Schrag, A. (2023). The failures of public art and participation. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.