The Value of Protected Areas Ranger Service Personnel for Biodiversity Monitoring: Case Study in Paklenica National Park (Croatia)
Author:
Bišćan Matko1, Lukač Gordan2, Špalj Franjo2, Blagajac Rea3, Jelić Dušan4, Maguire Ivana3, Massolo Alessandro567
Affiliation:
1. EKONERG – Energy and Environmental Protection Institute , Koranska 5 , Zagreb , Croatia 2. ‘Paklenica National Park’ Public Institution , Dr. F. Tuđmana 14a , Starigrad-Paklenica , Croatia 3. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science , University of Zagreb , Rooseveltov trg 6 , Zagreb , Croatia 4. Croatian Institute of Biodiversity, BIOTA Ltd , Maksimirska cesta 129/5 , Zagreb , Croatia 5. Department of Biology, Ethology Unit , Università di Pisa , Via Luca Ghini 13 , Pisa , Italy 6. Department of Ecosystem and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine , University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW , Calgary Alberta, T2N 1N4 , Canada 7. UMR CNRS 6249 Chrono-environnement, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté , Besancon , France
Abstract
Abstract
To preserve the long-term survival of habitats and wildlife, it is necessary to monitor their status. In protected areas, that is, biodiversity centres, rangers have excellent knowledge of specific locations and they spend a large amount of time in the field. But since rangers are not required to have a university degree, the question is whether they can be an added value in baseline survey monitoring. To investigate this issue, a case study was conducted in the Paklenica National Park (Paklenica NP), Croatia, using camera trapping survey between 2011 and 2016 at 22 camera sites. The aims of this survey were (1) to collect baseline data of mammalian diversity, (2) to analyse the regulatory effect of top predators on the trophic pyramid through top–down effects and (3) to estimate the data gathered by ranger service from the Paklenica NP. Data gathered through this study represents the first peer-reviewed list of medium- to large-sized mammals for Paklenica NP, as up till now, there is no peer-reviewed published paper of Paklenica NP mammalian diversity. Results showed that the recorded top predator–mesopredator–prey ratios were concordant with the trophic pyramid hypothesis. Also, as it was expected according to the literature, species richness indices were higher when top predators were present. On analysing the costs for conducting camera trapping survey by external and internal services, a significant difference was observed. Internal rangers’ cost was nine times lower than the external service cost. Future research run by rangers needs to be conducted in way to capture all mammalian biodiversity. Therefore, we propose camera trapping methodology for rangers in the protected areas since this may be an invaluable tool for biodiversity monitoring.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference43 articles.
1. Arnoni, H. (2018). Como se tornar um guarda-florestal?. https://super.abril.com.br/mundo-estranho/como-se-tornar-um-guarda-florestal/ 2. Bider, J. (1968). Animal activity in uncontrolled terrestrial communities as determined by a sand transect technique. Ecol. Monogr., 38(4), 269–308. DOI: 10.2307/1948530. 3. Bundesverband Naturwacht (2022). Germany’s rangers. https://www.bundesverband-naturwacht.de/?lang=en 4. Burton, A.C., Neilson, E., Moreira, D., Ladle, A., Steenweg, R., Fisher, J.T., Bayne, E. & Boutin S. (2015). Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. J. Appl. Ecol., 52(3), 675–685. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12432. 5. Chen, C., Brodie, J.F., Kays, R., Davies, T.J., Liu, R., Fisher, J.T., Ahumada, J., McShea, W., Sheil, D., Agwanda, B., Andrianarisoa, M.H., Appleton, R.D., Bitariho, R., Espinosa, S., Grigione, M.M., Helgen, K.M., Hubbard, A., Hurtado, C.M., Jansen, P.A., Jiang, X., Jones, A., Kalies, E.L., Kiebou-Opepa, C., Li, X., Lima, M., Meyer, E., Miller, A.B., Murphy, T., Piana, R., Quan, R.C., Rota, C.T., Rovero, F., Santos, F., Schuttler, S., Uduman, A., van Bommel,J.K., Young, H. & Burton A.C. (2022). Global camera trap synthesis highlights the importance of protected areas in maintaining mammal diversity. Conservation Letters, e12865. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12865.
|
|