The effects of O6-methyl guanine DNA-methyl transferase promotor methylation and CpG1, CpG2, CpG3 and CpG4 methylation on treatment response and their prognostic significance in patients with glioblastoma
Author:
Yildiz OG1, Aslan D1, Akalin H2, Erdem Y3, Canoz O4, Aytekin A5, Ozoner S1, Dundar M2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Erciyes University, School of Medicine , Kayseri , Turkey 2. Department of Medical Genetics, Erciyes University, School of Medicine , Kayseri , Turkey 3. Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Erciyes University, School of Pharmaceutical Science , Kayseri , Turkey 4. Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Erciyes University , Kayseri , Turkey 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital , Kayseri , Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
This retrospective study examined the prognostic significance and treatment effect of promoter methylation of O6- methyl guanine methyl transferase (MGMT) and meth-ylation of CpG 1, CpG2, CpG3 and CpG4 in glioblastoma (GB) patients received postoperative radiotherapy (PORT), with or without adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). One hundred patients with GB who received PORT with concomitant TMZ plus adjuvant TMZ or PORT alone, were included. The MGMT promoter methylation of CpG1, CpG2, CpG3 and CpG4 islands were examined. Overall, MGMT-methylation emerged as a significant prognostic factor for better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) [odds ratio (OR): 0.609, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.395-0.939, p = 0.02; OR: 0.662,95% CI: 0.430-1019, p = 0.5, respectively]. The methylation of each CpG1, CpG2, CpG3 and CpG4 islands was found to have no significant effects on OS and the methylation of each CpGl, CpG2 and CpG4 islands had no significant effect on PFS (p <0.05 for all). On the other hand, the methylation of CpG3 had a positive prognostic effect on PFS (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 0.99-4.67, p = 0.04). In the group that only received radiotherapy (RT), CpG1 and CpC3 methylations were found to have a positive prognostic significance in terms of PFS (OR: 266, 95% CI: 1.05-6.75, p -0.03 for CpG1; OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.01-5.92, p = 0.04 for CpG3). The MGMT promoter methylation represents an important biomarker for predicting response to therapy. Individual islands, particularly CpG3, deserves further investigation as a prognostic marker. Further studies need to be done with larger sample sizes to clarify the results.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics
Reference24 articles.
1. Shaw EG, Debinski W, Robbins ME. Central nervous system tumors. In: Gunderson LL, Tepper JE, Editors. Clinical Radiation Oncology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2007:457-493. 2. Siker ML, Donahue BR, Vogelbaum MA, Tome WA, Gilbert ML, Mehta MP. Primer intracranial neoplasms. In: Halperin EC, Perez CA, Brady LW, Editors. Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Wolters-Lippincott; 2008: 717-751. 3. Stieber VW, McMullen KP, Munley MT, Shaw EG. Central nervous system tumors. In: Levitt SH, Purdy JA, Perez CA, Vijayakumar S, Editors. Technical Basis of Radiation Therapy, 4th ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2006: 425-453. 4. Donahue BR. Adult gliomas. In: Lu JJ, Brady LW, Editors. Radiation Oncology - An Evidence-Based Approach, 1st ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2008: 483-501. 5. Woo SY. Central nervous system. In: Cox JD, Ang KK, Editors. Radiation Oncology. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Mosby Elsevier; 2010: 835-875.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|