General Concept of Neo-institutional Measurements of Business Processes

Author:

Derkacz Arkadiusz J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Social Sciences , Warsaw , Poland

Abstract

Abstract Objective: General concept of neo-institutional measurements of business processes is an approach developed by the author, which fits in with the practical search for appropriate methods and tools that would optimize effectiveness and efficiency of business process management. The objective of the following discussion is to prove the thesis that effectiveness of business processes that take place within a company depends on the quality of support of such processes that is included in the set of supporting factors, as well as on neo-institutional determinants of business processes. Methodology: In the article, the author used primarily long-term observations of the functioning of enterprises, critical literature analysis and thought experiment. Findings: The concept was based on long-term of author’s experience in business management and it was essentially grounded in the model of the new institutional economics. On the basis of critical analysis of the literature and with the use of empirical research results from different industries and countries, it defines four hypotheses, which make ground for the concept in question. These are: hypothesis of rational change of condition, hypothesis of expected determinants of business processes, hypothesis of rational determinants of business processes and intensity of impact hypothesis. Value Added: The concept presents a new holistic and behavioral method for business processes analysis. Recommendations: The general concept of neo-institutional measurements of business processes may become a new economic approach concerning the issues of effectiveness and efficiency of business processes, but also it may become the ground for creation of a new catalogue of recommendations for managers, who, on a daily basis, make difficult managerial decisions.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference28 articles.

1. Ayar, A., & Marechal, M. (2013).Unifying the syntax and semantics of modular extensions of Petri nets. Genève: Atelier d’impression ReproMail.

2. Brousseau, E., & Glachant, J.-M. (2008). New Institutional Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511754043

3. Bukłaha, E. (2016). Controlling projektów w organizacjach działających w Polsce – wyniki badań. Studia i Prace KZiF SGH Warszawa, (136), 143–158.

4. Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

5. Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional economics. The American Economic Review, (21), 648–657.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3