Affiliation:
1. University of Barcelona
Abstract
Abstract
The metaphysics of gender and race is a growing area of concern in contemporary analytic metaphysics, with many different views about the nature of gender and race being submitted and discussed. But what are these debates about? What questions are these accounts trying to answer? And is there real disagreement between advocates of differ- ent views about race or gender? If so, what are they really disagreeing about? In this paper I want to develop a view about what the debates in the metaphysics of gender and race are about, namely, a version of metaphysical deflationism, according to which these debates are about how we actually use or should use the terms ‘gender’ and ‘race’ (and other related terms), where moral and political considerations play a central role. I will also argue that my version of the view can overcome some recent and powerful objections to metaphysical deflationism of- fered by Elizabeth Barnes (2014, 2017).
Reference31 articles.
1. Andreasen, R. 2000. Race: biological reality or social construct? Philosophy of Science 67: S653–66.10.1086/392853
2. Ásta K. Sveinsdóttir. 2011. The metaphysics of sex and gender. In Feminist Metaphysics: Explorations in the Ontology of Sex, Gender and the Self, ed. by C. Witt. Springer, 47–65.
3. Barnes, E. 2014. Going beyond the fundamental: feminism in contemporary metaphysics. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104(3): 335–51.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2014.00376.x
4. Barnes, E. 2017. Realism and social Structure. Philosophical Studies 174(10): 2417–33. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0743-y10.1007/s11098-016-0743-y
5. Bettcher, T. 2013. Trans women and the meaning of ‘woman’. In Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings, Sixth Edition, ed. by A. Soble, N. Power and R. Halwani. Rowan and Littlefield, 233–50.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献