Risk analysis in maintenance processes

Author:

Drożyner Przemysław1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn , Poland

Abstract

Abstract The article aims to present practical methods for prioritising the activities of maintenance departments based on the Pareto analysis and the failure risk analysis. Based on the collected data on the number of observed failures and their removal times, commonly known reliability indicators were determined, which were then used to estimate the probabilities and consequences of failures in terms of the risk of loss of production continuity. Based on commonly collected failure data, the developed methods allow proposing to the maintenance departments the sequence of maintenance and repair work to be undertaken in terms of minimising the risk of failure. Risk analysis is somewhat commonly used in the practice of maintenance departments (e.g. RBI, FMEA, ETA, FTE, HIRA). The added value of this work is the use of reliability indicators for estimating the values of risk components, i.e., probability and consequences. The method was developed on the basis of operational data collected in one of the plants of the dairy cooperative and, after assessing the effects of its implementation, it was implemented in other enterprises of the cooperative.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Management Information Systems

Reference66 articles.

1. Ahlmann, H. (2002). From traditional practice to the new understanding: the significance of the Life Cycle Profit concept in the management of industrial enterprises. Maintenance Management & Modelling conference. International Foundation for Reseach in Maintenance.

2. Ahmadi, A., & Soderholm, P. (2008). Assessment of operational consequences of aircraft failures: Using event tree analysis. 2008 IEEE Aerospace conference, 1–14.

3. Al-kaabi, H., Potter, A., & Naim, M. (2007). Insights into the maintenance, repair and overhaul configurations of European airlines. Journal of Air Transportation, 12(2), 27–42.

4. Arunraj, N. S., & Maiti, J. (2007). Risk-based maintenance—Techniques and applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142(3), 653–661.

5. Bevilacqua, M., & Braglia, M. (2000). The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 70(1), 71–83.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Hierarchical Risk Communication Management Framework for Construction Projects;Engineering Management in Production and Services;2023-12-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3