Affiliation:
1. University of Chemistry and Technology Prague , Department of Carbohydrates and Cereals , Prague , Czech Republic
Abstract
Abstract
Basic wheat-barley flour premixes (70 : 30 and 50 : 50) were enhanced by 5 and 10% of dehulled and hulled hemp seeds wholemeal or by 2 types of hemp fine flour. Barley flour (BF) decreased both protein content and quality by approximately 1.5 and 50%, respectively. In blends, hemp fine flour containing recovered protein level back. BF lowered amylases activity by about 20–25% in maximum; hemp products had no significant effect. Farinograph water absorption was magnified by additions of both alternative flours. Considerable shortening of dough stability and decrease of resistance against over-mixing occurred for all flour tri-composites. Extensigraph dough elasticity increased and extensibility diminished. After dough resting taking 30 min, extensigraph energy of the control sample fell from 141 cm2 to a half as barley flour portion increased. In cereal composites, hemp products demonstrated reversal tendencies. BF lowered water suspension viscosity, but hemp wholemeal H4 and especially fine hemp flour H7 caused a recovery of amylograph maxima to level comparable with wheat control. Correlation analysis confirmed analytical and rheological data agreement – the extensigraph elasticity or energy could be predicted according to the Zeleny value, or the amylograph maximum according to the Falling Number (r = 0.79, 0.90, and 0.65, respectively; P = 99.9%).
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference23 articles.
1. Apostol L, Popa M, Mustatea G (2015): Cannabis sativa L. partially skimmed flour as source of bio-compounds in the bakery industry. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 20, 10837–10844.
2. Babiakova B (2015): Characteristics of composite mixtures containing non-traditional seeds. Master Thesis, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague. (in Slovak)
3. Callaway JC (2004): Hempseed as a nutritional resource: an overview. Euphytica, 140, 65–72. doi: 10.1007/s10681-004-4811-6.10.1007/s10681-004-4811-6
4. Chmelik J, Krumlova A, Budinska M, Kruml T, Psota V, Bohacenko I, Mazal P, Vydrova H. (2001): Comparison of size characterization of barley starch granules determined by electron and optical microscopy, low angle laser light scattering and gravitational field-flow fractionation. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 107, 11–17. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2001.tb00074.x.10.1002/j.2050-0416.2001.tb00074.x
5. Commission Regulation No. 432/2012. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/432/oj. Accessed March 26, 2018.