Affiliation:
1. Western Governors University
Abstract
AbstractThe concept of metaphysical grounding refers to a dependence relation—a relation between facts that is asymmetrical and non-causal. I aim to apply this concept to a Divine Command Theory (DCT) of moral obligations. Divine command theorists say that moral obligations arise from God’s commands. I argue that the three main views on the relation between the divine command and the obligation—causal, supervenience, and identity—do not capture all that we desire in a moral theory of obligations. After attempting to clarify metaphysical grounding in general, I articulate the distinction between what I call normative grounding and metaethical grounding. I then use this distinction to criticize Walter Sinnott-Armstrong’s discussion of DCT and to highlight the compatibility of DCT with other ethical theories.
Reference37 articles.
1. Adams RM (1987) Divine Command Metaethics Modified Again. In: Adams RM (ed) The Virtue of Faith and Other Essays in Philosophical Theology. New York: Oxford, pp. 128-143.
2. Adams RM (2015) Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics. New York: Oxford.
3. Audi P (2012) A Clarification and Defense of the Notion of Grounding. In: Correia F and Schnieder B Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. New York: Cambridge, pp. 101-121.10.1017/CBO9781139149136.004
4. Beckwith FJ (2019) Never Doubt Thomas: The Catholic Aquinas as Evangelical and Protestant. Waco: Baylor University Press.
5. Blackburn S (2001) Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford.