Effect of Concrete Class, Maximum Aggregate Size and Specimen Size on the Compressive Strength of Cores and Cast Specimens

Author:

Merabti Salem1

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory of Acoustics and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology , University Djilali Bounaama of Khemis-Miliana , Algeria

Abstract

Abstract Core sampling is the most accurate method of evaluating the compressive strength of concrete structures. However, it is preferable to take only small cores to avoid damaging the structures. It turns out that various elements influence the strength of compressed cores. This study examines the influence of specimen size, aggregate size, concrete class, and curing method on compressive strength. Three aggregates measuring 3/8, 8/15, and 15/25 mm are used to make six sets of concrete compositions with strengths of 25 MPa and 30 MPa. Nine specimens are made, one for each variety of aggregate and concrete. Cores of 100 mm, 75 mm, and 50 mm sizes are made. These cores are extracted from concrete blocks curing in the outside air to simulate the real concrete curing environment. Cast specimens cured in water and air with diameters of 50 mm, 100 mm, and 150 mm are also made. The objective is to compare the average compressive strength of all cast or extracted specimens with that of cylindrical standard specimens of diameter 150/300 mm and the cores and cast specimens. The obtained findings showed that the compressive strength is overestimated when we compare fp100 cores and standard air-cured specimens (fc), with a conversion factor varying from 0.69 to 0.96. However, a decrease is observed in comparison with water-cured specimens. The use of fp75 cores reduced the conversion factors, which are between 0.83 and 0.87 for B25 concrete. The highest fp/fc ratios are obtained for fc50 cores, which can reach 1.24. It turns out that the size of the core and the class of concrete have a much greater influence on the fp/fc ratios.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3