Independent verification of treatment planning system calculations

Author:

Dąbrowska-Szewczyk Edyta1ORCID,Zawadzka Anna2ORCID,Brzozowska Beata3ORCID,Walewska Agnieszka2ORCID,Kukołowicz Paweł2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer, Center and Institute of Oncology, Department of Medical Physics , W. K. Roentgena 5 Str. , Warsaw , Poland and University of Warsaw , Faculty of Physics, Biomedical Physics Division , Pasteura 5 Str. , Warsaw , Poland

2. Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer, Center and Institute of Oncology, Department of Medical Physics , W. K. Roentgena 5 Str. , Warsaw , Poland

3. University of Warsaw , Faculty of Physics, Biomedical Physics Division , Pasteura 5 Str. , Warsaw , Poland

Abstract

Abstract Purpose According to the available international recommendations, at least one independent verification of the calculations of number of monitor unit (MU) is required for every patient treated by teleradiotherapy. The aim of this study was to estimate the differences of dose distributions calculated with two treatment planning systems: Eclipse (Varian) and Oncentra MasterPlan (Elekta). Materials and methods The analysis was performed for 280 three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy treatment (3D-CRT) plans with photon beams from Varian accelerators: CL 600C/D X6 MV (109 plans), CL 2300C/D X6 MV (43 plans), and CL 2300C/D X15 MV (128 plans). The mean doses in the planning target volume (PTV) and doses at the isocenter point obtained with Eclipse and Oncentra MasterPlan (OMP) were compared with Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Additionally, the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations were compared with dosimetric measurements performed in the inhomogeneous phantom. Results Data were analysed for 6 MV plans and for 15 MV plans separately, independently of the treatment machine. The dose values calculated in Eclipse were significantly (p <0.001) higher compared to calculations of OMP system. The average difference of the mean dose to PTV was (1.4 ± 1.0)% for X6 MV and (2.5 ± 0.6)% for X15 MV. Average dose disparities at the isocenter point were (1.3 ± 1.9)% and (2.1 ± 1.0)% for X6 MV and X15 MV beams, respectively. The largest differences were observed in lungs, air cavities, and bone structures. Moreover the variation in dosimetric measurements was less as compared to Eclipse calculations. Conclusions OMP calculations were introduced as the independent MU verification tool with the first action level range equal to 3.5%.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Waste Management and Disposal,Condensed Matter Physics,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Instrumentation,Nuclear Energy and Engineering,Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Reference13 articles.

1. European Union. (2013). Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Official Journal of the European Union, OJ L13, 17.1.2014, 1–73. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:013:TOC.

2. Knöös, T., Johnsson, S. A., Ceberg, C. P., Tomaszewicz, A., & Nilsson, P. (2001). Independent checking of the delivered dose for high-energy X-rays using a hand-held PC. Radiother. Oncol., 58(2), 201–208.

3. Polish Minister of Health. (2011). Regulation of the Minister of Health of 18 February 2011 on the conditions for safe use of ionizing radiation for all types of medical exposure. Dz. U., 2011, no. 51, item 265. (in Polish).

4. Haslam, J. J., Bonta, D. V., Lujan, A. E., Rash, C., Jackson, W., & Roeske, J. C. (2003). Comparison of dose calculated by an intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning system and an independent monitor unit verification program. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys., 4(3), 224–230.

5. Mata Colodro, F., Serna Berná, A., & Puchades Puchades, V. (2013). Dosimetric validation of a redundant independent calculation software for VMAT fields. Phys. Med., 29(4), 341–349.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3