Architectural Comparison of Chosen Passive Building Standards

Author:

KOŁODZIEJCZYK-KĘSOŃ Ada1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. * MSc Eng. Arch.; Faculty of Architecture, Silesian University of Technology , Akademicka 7, 44-100 Gliwice , Poland

Abstract

Abstract The building sector consumes one-third of global final energy and emits nearly 40% of total CO2 emission. To decrease those numbers, it is necessary to design sustainable buildings, which have low heat and cooling demand. The Passive House standard was designed to meet these requirements however, some imperfections were observed. Therefore, a new approach the “be 2226” standard was put forward. This paper presents major architectural differences of those concepts and discusses their advantages and disadvantages. The main purpose is to develop guidelines how to design energy-efficient passive architecture. The Author used own mixed research method that included literature studies, analyses of technical documentation, in situ examinations, own measurements, and infrared tests. The comparison of two passive standards established strong, proven solutions, as well as incompatibilities and flows of each standard. The research main findings are that all buildings should be built in the passive manner and it would be beneficial to implement mixed standard. The main conclusion is that architectural creation has a great impact on passive solutions in buildings.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference62 articles.

1. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, “The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition Investing in a climate-neutral future for the benefit of our people, Brussels, on 17.9.2020, COM(2020) 562 final

2. https://www.iea.org/topics/buildings access date 28.05.2021

3. Ford B., (2001). Passive downdraught evaporative cooling: Principles and practice. Architectural Research Quarterly, 5(3), 271–280. doi:10.1017/S1359135501001312

4. Flynn E., (2016). (Experimenting with) Living Architecture: A practice perspective. Architectural Research Quarterly, 20(1), 20–28. doi:10.1017/S1359135516000166

5. Schiano-Phan R., (2010). Environmental retrofit: Building integrated passive cooling in housing. Architectural Research Quarterly, 14(2), 139–151. doi:10.1017/S1359135510000758

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3