Affiliation:
1. La Trobe University , School of Law , Melbourne , VIC, Australia ; Data61, CSIRO, Sydney, NSW, Australia , Federation University , Brisbane , QLD, Australia
Abstract
Abstract
Within the context of a larger project, in this paper, we discuss one-to-one mapping of the Shari’ah normative concepts of wajib, haram, sunnah, etc., with conventional normative concepts of obligation, prohibition, and permission. The goal of the mapping to gaining a better understanding of the Shari’ah normative concepts and what deontic effects they generate when applied, and what consequences can be attained through the actions as compared to the Western normative concepts. Existing literature lacks such understanding of the correspondence between the two normative systems. The mapping shows conceptual overlapping between the concepts, yet the two types of systems should be separated from each other in terms of the philosophy, context, and the consequences of the Islamic normative systems as the expression of the divine will.
Reference50 articles.
1. Abdul Karim, A. 2015. “Overcoming Taqlid in Muslim Institutions Of Learning”. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 6 (1): 43–57. http://www.iais.org.my/icr/index.php/icr/article/view/462
2. Ahmad, A, Mustapha, A, Ahmad, MS, & Yusoff, MZM. 2011. “Analyzing The Prin- ciples of Islamic Jurisprudence for a Normative Framework in Multi Agent Systems”. International Journal of Quranic Research, 1(1): 51–72.
3. Asasriwarni & M. Jandra / UMRAN. 2018. International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 5 (2-1): 1 – 11.
4. An-Nacim, A. 2010. “The Compatibility Dialectic: Mediating the Legitimate Coexistence of Islamic Law and State Law”. The Modern Law Review, 73 (1): 1-29. Retrieved December 21, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27755231
5. Al-Qaradawi, Y. 1999. The Lawful and the prohibited in Islam. Al-Falah Foundation.