Churchill’s reflection discourse

Author:

Bazylevych Nataliia1,Nikonova Vira2

Affiliation:

1. Kherson State University , Ukraine

2. Kyiv National Linguistic University , Ukraine

Abstract

Abstract This study presents the results of a cognitive analysis of Winston Churchill’s historical works and memoirs at the textual, lingual and conceptual levels in order to interpret the implicatures of Churchill’s reflection discourse. The scope of the present research covers Winston Churchill’s historical works and memoirs as one of the most fruitful types of literary text with regard to the realization of reflection, which is organically interwoven into his texts. The study is done by means of complex analysis with the application of discourse, textual, semantic, cognitive, and conceptual analyses. In the process of the investigation, it was found that Churchill’s reflection discourse represents a special form of language use that discloses a cognitive personality type, which is characterized by the prevalence of logical, deductive and cause-and-effect reasoning. The conceptual space of Churchill’s reflection discourse is constructed as a network model which represents different types of relations among the reflection concepts (subordination, identity, spatial, associative, subjective-and-causative, opposition, causativeand-resultative, attributive, qualitative, attributive-and-possessive, attributive-and-appositive, partitive, functional, reversive-and-functional, paradoxical, and dependency). The verbalization of the reflection concepts actualizes the implicatures of Churchill’s reflection discourse and helps determine the dominant messages implied in Winston Churchill’s historical works and memoirs.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference66 articles.

1. Alos-Ferrer, C., Garagnany, M. and Hugelschäfer, S., 2016. Cognitive reflection, decision biases, and response time. Front. Psychol, vol. 7, pp. 1-21. [Accessed 28 February 2021]. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01402/full.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01402

2. Anderson, L. W. et al., 2001. A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

3. Aristotle, 1987 [350 B. C. E.]. On the soul. (trans. from class. Greek: J. A. Smith). [Accessed 10 April 2021]. Available at: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.html.

4. Bachtin, M., 1990 [1923]. The author and the hero in aesthetic activity. Art and answerability. M. Holquist and V. Liapunov, eds. Austin: Texas UP.10.7560/704114

5. Barsalou, L. W., 1992. Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In: A. Lehrer and E. F. Kittay, еds. Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 21-74.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3