Affiliation:
1. Independent scholar, Budapest , Hungary
Abstract
Abstract
While being largely confined to different realms, planning and real estate also have a symbiotic relation. The logic of this relation varies in time and space, which makes the analysis of the balance between the two fields challenging. When we define these actions as institutions, potentially powerful analytic tools become available. This critical literature review examines some of the most relevant of them, in various specific institutional arenas, including the impact of planning on property markets and prices. The aim is to examine the role of institutions at the interface of urban planning and real estate. In other words, to see what kind of institutional effects are identifiable, whenever planning and property interests overlap. The conclusions suggest that a change in the urban fabric is likely to impact the possibility to use a site, and thereby also the value of land and built property.
Reference58 articles.
1. Adair A., Berry J., McGreal S., Poon J., Hutchison N., Watkins C., Gibb K., 2003, Benchmarking urban regeneration, RICS Foundation, London, England.
2. Adams D., Dunse N., White M., 2005, Conceptualising State–Market Relations in Land and Property: The Growth of Institutionalism – Extension or Challenge to Mainstream Economics? In: Adams, D., Watkins, C. and White, M. (Eds.): Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets, pp. 37-55. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
3. Angjellari-Dajci F., Cebula R.J., 2016, The impact of historic district designation on the prices of singlefamily homes in the oldest city in the United States, St. Augustine, Florida, Journal of Property Research, 33(1), 64-96.
4. Ball M., 1998, Institutions in British Property Research: A Review. Urban Studies, 35(9), 1501-1517.
5. Ball M., Jones C., 2013, Introduction to Special Issue, Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 167-169.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献