Affiliation:
1. Department of Design and Planning , IUAV University of Venice
Abstract
Abstract
Within the scope of real estate appraisal, the Depreciated Replacement Cost method is mostly seen as a solution of last resort, when no other option is available. Nonetheless, it is ever more useful in addressing various estimation needs. In its basic formulation, the method suffers from several simplifications that lead to rather rough results. Here we try to go beyond these limits. To this end, we propose a variant based on the following three cornerstones. The first is the partition of the replacement cost into its fundamental components, at least according to three cost items: building structure, finishes, and installations. The second cornerstone is the formulation of different depreciation curves for each of the cost items mentioned above, by processing distinct data on useful life and residual life. Finally, the third cornerstone is represented by the definition of a complex depreciation function to take into account both the original useful life of the construction and its lengthening due to partial or full refurbishments.
Reference38 articles.
1. Appraisal Institute, 2013, The Appraisal of Real Estate, 14th Edition, Chicago.
2. Baum A., 1991, Property Investment Depreciation and Obsolescence, London: Routledge.
3. Bostic R.W., Longhofer S.D., Redfearn C.L., 2007, Land leverage: Decomposing Home Price Dynamics, Real Estate Economics, No. 35 (2), pp. 183–208.10.1111/j.1540-6229.2007.00187.x
4. Bourassa S.C., Hoesli M., Scognamiglio D., Zhang S., 2011, Land Leverage and House Prices, Regional Science and Urban Economics, No. 41 (2), pp. 134–144.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.11.002
5. Boyd T., Boyd S., 2012, Valuing the Land Component of Improved Investment Property, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, No. 30 (4), pp. 338–353.10.1108/14635781211241752
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献