A “psychopathic” Artificial Intelligence: the possible risks of a deviating AI in Education

Author:

Zanetti Margot1,Iseppi Giulia2,Cassese Francesco Peluso1

Affiliation:

1. Università Niccolò Cusano , Italy

2. Independent Researcher, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract This work analyses the use of artificial intelligence in education from an interdisciplinary point of view. New studies demonstrated that an AI can “deviate” and become potentially malicious, due to programmers’ biases, corrupted feeds or purposeful actions. Knowing the pervasive use of artificial intelligence systems, including in the educational environment, it seemed necessary to investigate when and how an AI in education could deviate. We started with an investigation of AI and the risks it poses, wondering if they could be applied also to educative AI. We then reviewed the increasing literature that deals with the use of technology in the classroom, and the criticism about it, referring to specific use cases. Finally, as a result, the authors formulate questions and suggestions for further research, to bridge conceptual gaps underlined by lack of research.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference47 articles.

1. Almohammadi, K., Hagras, H., Alghazzawi, D., Aldabbagh, G. (2017). A survey of artificial intelligence techniques employed for adaptive educational systems within e-learning platforms. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft-Computing Research, 7(1), 47-64.

2. Amini, A., Soleimany, A., Schwarting, W., Bhatia, S., Rus, D., (2019). Uncovering and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias through Learned Latent Structure, Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and Society.

3. Athalye, A, Engstrom, L., Ilyas, A., Kwok, K., (2018). Synthesizing Robust Adversarial Examples, Proceedings of the 35 th International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, Sweden, PMLR 80.

4. Automatic Language Processing Advisory Committee. (1966). Languages and machines: computers in translation and linguistics. A report by the Automatic Language Processing Advisory Committee, Division of Behavioral Sciences, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, 1966. (Publication 1416.)

5. Baggaley, J. (2010). The Luddite Revolt continues. Distance Education, 31(3), 337–343.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3