Comparation Among Opioid-Based, Low Opioid and Opioid Free Anesthesia in Colorectal Oncologic Surgery

Author:

Toleska Marija1,Dimitrovski Aleksandar1,Dimitrovska Natasha Toleska2

Affiliation:

1. 1 University Clinical Center “Mother Teresa” Skopje, University Clinic of TOARILUC , Department of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Intensive Care – KARIL, Medical Faculty - Skopje, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” in Skopje , RN Macedonia

2. 2 University Clinical Center “Mother Teresa” Skopje, University Clinic for Thoracic and Vascular Surgery , Medical Faculty -Skopje, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” in Skopje , Republic of Macedonia

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Opioids are the “gold standard” for pain treatment during and after colorectal surgery. They can inhibit cellular and humoral immunity and it is assumed that can promote cancer cell proliferation and metastatic spread. Adequate pain management can be achieved not only with opioids, but also with non-opioid drugs, which can be used together in small doses, i.e., multimodal analgesia, and can lower the need for opioids during and after surgery. Opioid free anesthesia (OFA) is part of multimodal analgesia, where opioids are not used in the intraoperative period. Materials and methods: In this prospective and randomized clinical study 60 patients scheduled for open colorectal surgery were enrolled. They were between the ages of 45 and 70 with the American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications 1, 2 and 3, divided in three groups. The first group of patients, or Opioid-based anesthesia group (OBAG), received the following for induction to anesthesia: lidocaine at 1 mg/kg, fentanyl 100 at µgr, propofol at 2mg/kg and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg. They intermittently received 50-100 µgr fentanyl intravenously and 0.25 % bupivacaine 2-3 ml every 30-45 minutes, given in the epidural catheter during surgery. The second group of patients, or Low opioid anesthesia group (LOAG), received the following for induction to anesthesia: lidocaine at 1 mg/kg, fentanyl at 100 µgr, propofol at 2mg/kg and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg. Prior to surgery, 50 µgr of fentanyl with 5 ml 0.25% bupivacaine was given into the epidural catheter, and the same dose was received at the end of surgery. The third group, or Opioid free anesthesia group (OFAG), received the following before the induction to general anesthesia: dexamethasone at 0.1 mg/kg and 1 gr of paracetamol. Induction to general anesthesia was with lidocaine at 1 mg/kg, propofol at 2mg/kg, ketamine at 0.5 mg/kg and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg. After intubation, intravenous continuous infusion with lidocaine was at 2 mg/kg/h, ketamine 0.2 mg/kg/h and magnesium 15 mg/kg/h loaded on and intermittently 0.25 % bupivacaine 2-3 ml every 30-45 minutes given in the epidural catheter during surgery. The primary goal was to measure the patients’ pain after the first 72 postoperative hours in all three groups (2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours after surgery). The secondary goal was to measure the total amount of morphine given in the epidural catheter in the postoperative period in all three groups. Other secondary goals were: to compare the total amount of fentanyl given intravenously during surgery in the first and second groups, determine if there was a need to use rescue analgesia in the postoperative period, measure the occurrence of PONV, and to measure the total amount of bupivacaine given in the epidural catheter during operation in all three groups. Results: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score comparisons between groups showed patients from the OBA and LOA groups had significantly higher VAS scores, compared to the patients from the OFA group 2, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation. After 6 hours postoperatively, patients from the LOA group had significantly higher VAS scores, compared to patients from the OBA and OFA groups. After 36 hours postoperatively, patients from the OBA group had significantly higher VAS scores compared to patients from the LOA and OFA groups. At the last follow-up point, 72 hours after the intervention, the patients from the OBA and LOA groups had significantly higher VAS scores compared to the patients from the OFA group. All patients from the OBA and LOA groups, and only 9 from the OFA group received morphine in the postoperative period via epidural catheter. Patients from the Opioid group received significantly higher amounts of fentanyl during surgery. Additional administration of another analgesic drug in the postoperative period was prescribed in 55% of patients in the OBAG, in 50% in the LOAG and in 35% of the OFA group. PONV was registered in 60% of patients from the OBAG and in 40% of patients from the LOAG. In the OFA group did not register PONV in any of the patients. The biggest amount of bupivacaine given during surgery was in the OBAG (26.37 ± 2.6 mg), in LOAG was 25.0 ± 0 and the less in OFAG group (24.50 ± 4.3). Conclusion: Patients from OFA group, compared with patients from OBAG and LOAG, have the lowest pain score in first 72 hours after open colorectal surgery, received fewer opioids via an epidural catheter in the postoperative period, had less need for rescue analgesia, no occurrence of PONV, and less need for bupivacaine via an epidural catheter in the intraoperative period.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3