Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Scalpel Versus Electrosurgery for Skin Incisions in the Facial Regions

Author:

Peneva Margarita1,Gjorgjeska Andrijana1,Gjorgova Smilja Tudzarova1,Dzonov Boro1,Noveski Lazo1,Ginoski Vladimir1,Tolevska Roza Dzoleva2,Breshkovska Hristina1

Affiliation:

1. University Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , Medical Faculty, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University , Skopje , Republic of Macedonia

2. University Clinic for Orthopedic surgery , Medical Faculty, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University , Skopje , Republic of Macedonia

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Postoperative pain presents a significant medical problem. It can create a considerable discomfort in the immediate postoperative period and thus increase patient’s morbidity. Multiple mechanisms are involved in its’ etiology, one of them being the method of tissue incision. The aim of this study is to compare the early postoperative pain following incision with two different methods, scalpel and electrosurgery in the facial regions. Material and methods: Eighty patients with both benign and malignant skin lesions in the facial regions undergoing surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized in two groups. In group A, comprising 40 patients, cold steel surgical scalpel №15 was used for the surgical procedure. Electrosurgical microneedle with 0.06mm tip radius and generator unit KLS Martin Electrosurgical Unit ME MB 2 set on cutting mode, power 12 W was used for performing the surgery in group B including the same number of patients. After the surgery patients were given analgesics on their demand. The total number of on demand analgesics requirements was calculated. The patients were also asked to note the oral analgesics they were taking after being released from the hospital. Results: Results of this study showed a statistically significant difference between the groups in the analgesics demand on the day of the operation (p=0.041). On the day of the operation 52.5% patients in the scalpel group and only 30% of the patents of the electrosurgery group received analgesics on demand. In all other analysed time points, the patients in the scalpel group received analgesics more often than the patients in the microneedle group, but with no statistically confirmed difference between the groups (p>0.05). Even more significant is the fact that patients treated with electrosurgery that needed analgesics, had significantly bigger excision area median 471 (rank 283-589) compared to the patients treated with the conventional method 289 (rank 177-432) (p=0.016). Conclusion: In accordance with previous studies our results suggested a significantly reduced postoperative pain in the electrosurgery group.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. 1. Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Segelcke D, Schug SA. Postoperative pain - from mechanisms to treatment. Pain Reports. 2017; 2(2): e588. doi:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000588.10.1097/PR9.0000000000000588

2. 2. Diva Shrestha. Evaluation of pain following the use of scalpel versus diathermy for skin incisions in Ear, Nose, Throat and Head and Neck surgeries. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2018 Jan-Mar; 16(38): 58–60.

3. 3. Petrovski M, Kaftandziev I, Petrovski D, Zhogovska E, Cvetanovski V, Todorovik L, et al. Surgical propaedeutics, practicum for exercises. 1 edition. Skopje: Makavej, 2006.

4. 4. Scalpel in Wikipedia. Retrieved June 16, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalpel.

5. 5. Пановски М. Електрохирургија. Скопје: Табернакул: 2013.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3