Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in the Republic of North Macedonia
Author:
Gavrilovska-Brzanov Aleksandra1, Stavridis Sotir2, Dohchev Sasho2, Mijovska Maja Mojsova3, Petrusheva-Panovska Aleksandra1, Trifunovski Aleksandar2, Janculev Josif2, Trajkovski Dimitar2, Stankov Viktor2, Srceva Marija Jovanovski1, Brzanov Nikola1
Affiliation:
1. 1 University Clinic for Traumatology, Orthopedic disease, Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency department , Clinical Center Mother Theresa Faculty of Medicine, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” , Skopje , RN Macedonia 2. 2 University Clinic for Urology, Clinical Center Mother Theresa, Faculty of Medicine , University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” , Skopje , RN Macedonia 3. 3 Faculty of Medical science , University “Goce Delchev” – Shtip , RN Macedonia
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has become the technique of choice for living donor kidney donations. Since 2018, 30 procedures have been performed at our clinic using this technique. The goal of this comparative analysis was to determine how surgical technique, specifically, hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy with hand assistance may affect early graft function when compared to open classical nephrectomy.
Material and methods: Retrospective analyses were performed, comparing the two techniques of kidney donation. Kidney transplantation was performed with the open standard technique in both groups. The primary outcome was early graft function, and levels of urine output, and plasma creatinine were analyzed at three time points. A secondary outcome was the quality of the operative technique, which was determined by the time of warm ischemia, blood loss, and duration of surgery. Additionally, we noted all complications, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction.
Results: In terms of warm ischemia time, there was no statistically significant difference between donors in both groups. It is important to note that in 2 recipients from Group II we did not observe diuresis at the conclusion of the operation. The recipients’ diuresis was 515 ml ± 321SD in group I and 444 ml ± 271SD in group II. At 3, 12, and 36 hours postoperatively, there were statistically significant differences in the average serum creatinine values (p 0.05) in favor of group I. Similar results were observed in the second time measurement at 12 h and the third time measurement at 36 h for serum urea levels in recipients. The difference in serum urea values between the recipients in the groups at the first measurement (3h) following surgery was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is recognized as a safe and effective treatment. Donors in this situation have a different profile from other surgical patients; hence, they do not undergo surgery due to their own medical condition but for an altruistic reason, and with hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy. Such patients receive all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. The two main objectives of a donor nephrectomy are to give the recipient the best possible kidney and to ensure the donor’s complete safety.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference26 articles.
1. Polenakovic MH, Spasovski G. Sixth Congresses of the Macedonian Society for Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation and Artificial Organs (MSNDTAO) - Stimulus for the Development of Nephrology in N. Macedonia. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2020 Dec 8;41(3):95-121. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2020-0051. 2. Spasovski G, Busic M, Delmonico F. Improvement in kidney transplantation in the Balkans after the Istanbul Declaration: where do we stand today? Clin Kidney J. 2016 Feb;9(1):172-5. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv116. Epub 2015 Nov 3. Higashihara E, Baba S, Nakagawa K, Murai M, Go H, Takeda M, Takahashi K, Suzuki K, Fujita K, Ono Y, Ohshima S, Matsuda T, Terachi T, Yoshida O. Learning curve and conversion to open surgery in cases of laparoscopic adrenalectomy and nephrectomy. J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):650-3. 4. Gavrilovska-Brzanov A, Dohchev S, Stavridis S, Panovska Petrusheva A, Srceva Jovanovski M, Kuzmanovska B, Risteski T, Ivanovski O, Brzanov N, Spasovski G. Analgesia in Kidney Transplant Recipients. BANTAO Journal 2021; 19(1): 14-19. 5. Heemann U, Abramowicz D, Spasovski G, Van-holder R; European Renal Best Practice Work Group on Kidney Transplantation. Endorsement of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines on kidney transplantation: a European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Jul;26(7):2099-106. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr169. Epub 2011 May 9
|
|