Affiliation:
1. University of Edinburgh
Abstract
Abstract
It is sometimes argued that languages with two-way laryngeal contrasts can be classified according to whether one series is realized canonically with voicing lead or the other with voicing lag. In languages of the first type, such as French, the phonologically relevant feature is argued to be [voice], while in languages of the second type, such as German, the relevant feature is argued to be [spread glottis]. A crucial assumption of this position is that the presence of certain contextually stable phonetic cues, namely voicing lead or lag, can be used to diagnose the which feature is phono-logically active.
In this paper, we present data on obstruent-intrinsic F0 perturbations (CF0) in two [voice] languages, French and Italian. Voiceless obstruents in both languages are found to raise F0, while F0 following (pre)voiced obstruents patterns together with sonorants, similar to the voiceless unaspirated stops of [spread glottis] languages like German and English. The contextual stability of this cue implies that an active de-voicing gesture is common to languages of both the [voice] and [spread glottis] types, and undermines the idea that a strict binary dichotomy between true voicing and aspirating languages can be reliably inferred based on properties of the surface phonetics.
Reference71 articles.
1. Abramson, A. S. and D. H. Whalen. 2017. “Voice Onset Time (VOT) at 50: Theoretical and practical issues in measuring voicing distinctions”. Journal of Phonetics 63. 75–86.10.1016/j.wocn.2017.05.002
2. Archangeli, D. and D. Pulleyblank. 1994. Grounded phonology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
3. Avery, P. and W. J. Idsardi. 2001. “Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement”. In: Hall, T. A. and U. Kleinhanz (eds.), Distinctive feature theory. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 41–70.10.1515/9783110886672.41
4. Beckman, J., P. Helgason, B. McMurray and C. Ringen. 2011. “Rate effects on Swedish VOT: Evidence for phonological overspecification”. Journal of Phonetics 39(1). 39–49.10.1016/j.wocn.2010.11.001
5. Beckman, J., M. Jessen and C. Ringen. 2013. “Empirical evidence for laryngeal features: Aspirating vs. true voice languages”. Journal of Linguistics 49(2). 259–284.10.1017/S0022226712000424
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献