Comparison of Diagnostic Tests for Detection of Bovine Rotavirus a in Calf Feces
Author:
Barua Shama Ranjan1, Islam Shariful23, Siddiki А.М.А.М. Zonaed1, Masuduzzaman Md1, Hossain Mohammad Alamgir1, Chowdhury Sharmin1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Pathology and Parasitology , Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University , Zakir Hossain, Chattogram 4225 , Bangladesh 2. Animal Health Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI) , Dhaka - 1341 , Bangladesh 3. EcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY 10001-2023, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Bovine rotavirus A (BRVA) is a frequent causative agent of diarrhea in neonatal calves. Accurate and rapid diagnosis is crucial to prevent calf mortality from BRVA induced diarrhea. Currently, variety of diagnostic methods are being used to detect BRVA from calves’ feces: antibody-based rapid test and ELISA, and molecular-based RT-PCR and RT-qPCR. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the rapid test (Immunochromatography), ELISA, and RT-PCR assays, using RT-qPCR as the gold standard, in detection of BRVA in diarrheic calves’ fecal samples. One hundred (n=100) clinically diarrheic fecal samples were tested with four different diagnostic tools. The percent of samples positive by rapid test, ELISA, RT-PCR and RT-qPCR was 10%, 16%, 17%, and 33%, respectively. The agreement between different assays was 75% to 99%. The highest agreement was observed between ELISA and RT-PCR assay (99%). The lowest agreement was recorded (75%) between rapid test and RT-qPCR. The sensitivity of the rapid test, ELISA, and RT-PCR were 30%, 49%, and 52%, respectively when compared to the reference test (RT-qPCR), whereas specificity was 100% for all assays. In conclusion, none of the frequently used diagnostic tests showed a satisfactory level of sensitivity to identify BRVA in calves’ feces. Therefore, the use of a more sensitive rapid test should be used to identify infected calves in field conditions in order to prevent calf mortality from rotaviral diarrhea.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference29 articles.
1. 1. Fritzen, J.T., Oliveira, M.V., Lorenzetti, E., Alfieri, A.F., Alfieri, A.A. (2020). Genotype constellation of a rotavirus A field strain with an uncommon G8P [11] genotype combination in a rotavirus-vaccinated dairy cattle herd. Arch Virol. 165, 1855-1861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04675-7 PMid:32472289 2. 2. Cho, Y.I., Yoon, K.J. (2014). An overview of calf diarrhea-infectious etiology, diagnosis, and intervention. J Vet Sci. 15(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2014.15.1.1 PMid:24378583 PMCid:PMC3973752 3. 3. Al Mawly, J., Grinberg, A., Prattley, D., Moffat, J., Marshall, J., French, N. (2015). Risk factors for neonatal calf diarrhoea and enteropathogen shedding in New Zealand dairy farms. Vet J. 203(2): 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.01.010 PMid:25653209 PMCid:PMC7110729 4. 4. Singh, S., Singh, R., Singh, K.P., Singh, V., Malik, Y.P.S., Kamdi, B., Singh, R., Kashyap, G. (2019). Prevalence of bovine coronavirus infection in organized dairy farms of Central and North regions, India. Biol Rhythm Res. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1629093 5. 5. Barua, S.R., Rakib, T.M., Rahman, M.M., Selleck, S., Masuduzzaman, M., Siddiki, A.Z., Hossain, M.A., Chowdhury, S. (2019). Disease burden and associated factors of rotavirus infection in calves in south-eastern part of Bangladesh. Asian J Med Biol Res. 5(2): 107-116.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|