The climate change movement and political parties: Mechanisms of social media and interaction during the 2019 electoral period in Finland

Author:

Savolainen Sonja1,Ylä-Anttila Tuomas1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Social Sciences , University of Helsinki , Finland

Abstract

Abstract Building on the framework of electoral contention, we investigate the interaction dynamics between social movements and political parties during elections. We argue that social media today is an important venue for these interactions, and consequently, analysing social media data is useful for understanding the shifts in the conflict and alliance structures between movements and parties. We find that Twitter discussions on the climate change movement during the 2019 electoral period in Finland reveal a process of pre-election approaching and post-election distancing between the movement and parties. The Greens and the Left formed mutually beneficial coalitions with the movement preceding the elections and took distance from one another after these parties entered the government. These findings suggest that research on movement-party interaction should pay more attention to social media and undertake comparative studies to assess whether the approaching-distancing process and its constituent mechanisms characterise movements beyond the climate strikes in Finland.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference52 articles.

1. Barry, E., & Lemola, J. (2019, April 12). The right's new rallying cry in Finland: ‘Climate Hysteria’. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/12/world/europe/finland-populism-immigration-climate-change.html

2. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

3. Blee, K., & Currier, A. (2006). How local social movement groups handle a presidential election. Qualitative Sociology, 29(3), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9025-x

4. Cammaerts, B., Mattoni, A., & McCurdy, P. (2013). Mediation and protest movements. Intellect.

5. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 238–266.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3