The uses of the term polarisation in Swedish newspapers, 2010–2021

Author:

Farjam Mike1,Bruhn Tommy2,Gustafsson Nils3,Segesten Anamaria Dutceac1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Languages and Literature, European Studies , Lund University , Sweden

2. Department of Communication , University of Copenhagen , Denmark

3. Department of Strategic Communication , Lund University , Sweden

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we investigate the rhetorical uses and media frames associated with the term polarisation in Swedish print media from 2010 to 2021. We first produce a qualitative and detailed assessment of a sample of 240 articles and then proceed to a computational (word2vec) analysis of all major Swedish newspaper articles including the term (N = 32,805). We find that the term has changed its rhetorical function over time. Initially used to describe, – that is, used as a technical descriptor of events and issues in society – this use later became increasingly vague and general. Instead, it has been rhetorically used to amplify, implying a sense of urgency, conflict, or threat. Over time, the term has been used increasingly frequently, but has been applied less to Sweden and, instead, most often associated with political actors and events in the US. Moreover, we find that, for Sweden, the term polarisation was mostly related to social and political issues, whereas for the US, it carried affective associations.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Communication

Reference50 articles.

1. Amréus, L. (2013, June 17). Höga hus men lågt i tak [Tall houses but low ceilings]. Dagens Industri.

2. Arborelius, A., Atas, B., Jackelén, A., Svensson, L., & Wiborn, K. (2018, June 21). Vi ser dagligen hur familjer slits isär [We see daily how families are torn apart]. Aftonbladet. https://www.aftonbladet.se/debatt/a/wEQP0M/vi-ser-dagligen-hur-familjer-slits-isar

3. Bolling, A. (2019, September 27). DN/Ipsos: Så mycket har Greta Thunberg påverkat synen på klimatet [DN/Ipsos: So much has Greta Thunberg affected the view of the climate]. Dagens Nyheter. http://www.dn.se/nyheter/politik/dnipsos-sa-mycket-har-greta-thunberg-paverkat-synen-pa-klimatet/

4. Dalton, R. J., & Berning, C. C. (2022). Ideological polarization and far-right parties in Europe. In H.U. Brinkmann, & K. H. Reuband (Eds.), Rechtspopulismus in Deutschland: Wahlverhalten in Zeiten politischer Polarisierung [Right-wing populism in Germany: Voting behaviour in times of political polarisation] (pp. 13–35). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33787-2_2

5. De Vreese, C. H., & Lecheler, S. (2012). News framing research: An overview and new developments. In H. A. Semetko, & M. Scammell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political communication (pp. 292–306). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3