Affiliation:
1. Department of Journalism and Media Studies , Oslo Metropolitan University , Norway
Abstract
Abstract
While small groups leverage disproportionate visibility online, oftentimes resorting to hostile language, the use of social media for political expression by the majority of Norwegian users has been theorised in terms of lurking, inhibition, and self-restraint. Drawing from qualitative in-depth interviews with young adults of different political orientations and ethnic-cultural backgrounds in Oslo, Norway, I take an abductivehermeneutic approach to analyse their rationale for self-censorship. The findings reveal shared frustrations and risks that explain the prevalence of lurking yet point to different coping mechanisms and expression strategies adopted by the respondents. While progressives tend to internalise their reactions by withdrawing and avoiding confrontations, conservatives more often appeal to self-censorship on the presumption of actual censorship. Different styles of media use call into question divergent ideals of democratic theory, setting self-expressive rationality at odds with deliberative norms of citizenship. I argue that this can help explain increasing perceived political polarisation and disconnection tendencies.
Reference30 articles.
1. Arendt, H., Jaspers, K., Köhler, L., & Saner, H. (1993). Hannah Arendt/Karl Jaspers correspondence, 1926–1969. Harcourt Brace. http://archive.org/details/isbn_9780156225991
2. Banaji, S., & Mejias, S. (2020). Youth active citizenship in Europe: Ethnographies of participation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35794-8
3. Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (Eds.). (1993). Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral preference. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173544
4. Crawford, K. (2011). Listening, not lurking: The neglected form of participation. In H. Greif, & A. Lasén (Eds.), Cultures of Participation: Media practices, politics and literacy (pp. 63–77). Cost.
5. Dahlgren, P. (2014). Political participation via the web: Structural and subjective contingencies. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 5(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc.5.3.255_1