Confirmation of differentiation clusters’ and endoglin markers preset in porcine buccal mucosa cells
Author:
Borowiec Blanka1, Bryl Rut2, Bryja Artur2, Mozdziak Paul34, Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska Marta25
Affiliation:
1. Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences , Poznań , Poland 2. Department of Anatomy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences , Poznań , Poland 3. Physiology Graduate Program, North Carolina State University , Raleigh , USA 4. Prestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University , Raleigh , USA 5. Department of Biomaterials and Experimental Dentistry, Poznań University of Medical Sciences , Poznań , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
Several genes, namely CD44, CD90, CD105 and PCNA may be important in differentiation of porcine mucosa cell cultures. These genes are, inter alia, responsible for cell adhesion to extracellular matrix and its constituent secretion, cytoskeleton organization, epithelial to mesenchymal transition or proper course of DNA replication. A total of 20 pubertal crossbred Landrace gilts bred on commercial farms were used to produce buccal mucosa cultures, which were harvested on the 7th, 15th and 30th day after initiation of the culture. Expression levels of CD44, CD90, CD105 and PCNA were evaluated employing Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction. CD44, CD90 and PCNA showed an unchanged expression pattern. Expression of CD44 on day 7 was the highest of all factors measured. The greatest difference between the measurement on 7th and 30th day was found in the PCNA gene. These results broaden the understanding of the transcriptome changes in porcine buccal mucosa cells for the duration of in vitro cultivation. Nevertheless, it is very important to consider that the in vitro conditions do not fully reflect the changes taking place in the living organism. It appears that tissues of the oral cavity possess high regenerative potential, and constitute suitable model for wound healing investigation.
Running title: Confirmation of differentiation clusters’ and endoglin markers preset in porcine buccal mucosa cells
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Cell Biology,Molecular Biology
Reference53 articles.
1. Swindle MM, Smith AC. Swine in biomedical research. Source B. Model. Biomed. Res., Humana Press; 2008; DOI:10.1007/978-1-59745-285-4_26. 2. Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mertz P. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2001;9:66–76. 3. Ross JW, Fernandez de Castro JP, Zhao J, Samuel M, Walters E, Rios C, Bray-Ward P, Jones BW, Marc RE, Wang W, Zhou L, Noel JM, McCall MA, DeMarco PJ, Prather RS, Kaplan HJ. Generation of an inbred miniature pig model of retinitis pigmentosa. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:501–7; DOI:10.1167/iovs.11-8784. 4. Groenen MAM, Archibald AL, Uenishi H, Tuggle CK, Takeuchi Y, Rothschild MF, Rogel-Gaillard C, Park C, Milan D, Megens HJ, Li S, Larkin DM, Kim H, Frantz LAF, Caccamo M, Ahn H, Aken BL, Anselmo A, Anthon C, Auvil L, Schook LB, et al. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature. 2012;491:393–8; DOI:10.1038/nature11622. 5. Zola H, Swart B, Banham A, Barry S, Beare A, Bensussan A, Boumsell L, D. Buckley C, Bühring HJ, Clark G, Engel P, Fox D, Jin BQ, Macardle PJ, Malavasi F, Mason D, Stockinger H, Yang X. CD molecules 2006 - Human cell differentiation molecules. J Immunol Methods. 2007;319:1–5; DOI:10.1016/j.jim.2006.11.001.
|
|