Affiliation:
1. University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain)
Abstract
Abstract
For the last decades interest in leadership skills training is a persistent feature of the design of contents in many educational curricula at different levels. This relevance has been highlighted in an abundant literature on leadership training and in the development of guidelines that some prominent transnational organizations have published as a convenient way to focus that training. This article summarizes the findings of the first part of a research devoted to the study of the approaches of the training in “leadership” and “digital leadership” by three stakeholders: training providers; scholars; and some major transnational organizations. The research aims to clarify the concept adopted, the priorities established and the competencies that have been considered suitable to be transmitted. Through a documentary review of leadership development training programs delivered by national schools of public administration in European Union member countries, this paper examines the perspective adopted to train civil servants in those competencies considered suitable to be transmitted when training for leadership and digital leadership.
Reference11 articles.
1. Avolio, B. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62, 25–33.10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.25
2. Bouzas-Lorenzo, R. & Barral Buceta, B. (2022), Oferta formativa en liderazgo digital en las escuelas europeas de Administración pública. In La Eclosión de las Nuevas Narrativas en la Sociedad Digital. Madrid: Dykinson (in press).
3. Bouzas-Lorenzo, R., Barral Buceta, B. & Cernadas Ramos, A. (2021). Opinion of top officials about leadership in public organizations. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 114, 9–17.10.15405/epsbs.2021.07.02.2
4. Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 581–613.10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00061-8
5. Gherheș, V., Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., & Stanici, M. (2021). E-learning vs. face-to-face learning: Analyzing students’ preferences and behaviors. Sustainability, 13(8), 4381.