Vulnerabilities of Financial Auditing and its Adaptation to the Current Needs of the Users

Author:

Floştoiu Sebastian1

Affiliation:

1. 1 “NICOLAE BĂLCESCU” LAND FORCES ACADEMY , SIBIU , ROMANIA

Abstract

Abstract Starting from the premise that the great economic crises of the last decades were based on the great financial scandals that shook the world economy, I found that auditing in general, and the process of auditing financial statements, has started to be questioned. Thus, I believe that it is necessary and obligatory to analyze whether financial audit, as it is now, is still suitable for modern society, i.e. whether its construction and methodology still meets the requirements of a constantly evolving market economy. Because of this, I considered it appropriate to carry out an analysis, aimed to identify new perspectives for the development of financial auditing in line with the requirements of a constantly changing market economy. I started my scientific approach from the identification and presentation of possible vulnerabilities in the work carried out by financial auditors, which may occur when formulating the audit opinion. My aim was to analyze the main elements that generate or enhance these vulnerabilities and to identify possible ways of combating and eliminating these effects in order to improve and increase the confidence of users of financial accounting information in their work.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference10 articles.

1. Alleyne, P., & Howard, M. (2005). An Exploratory Study of Auditors’ Responsibility for Fraud Detection. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 20 Issue 3.

2. Ardelean, A. (2013). Considerații privind ecartul de așteptare și încrederea publicului față de auditori. Revista Audit Financiar, Nr. 8.

3. Black, J. (2008). Forms and paradoxes of principles-based regulation. Capital Markets Law Journal, Vol. 3, Issue 4.

4. Bunget, O.C., Dumitrescu, A.C., & Deliu, D. (2014). Impact of financial crisis on financial audit activity in Romania. European Journal of accounting, finance and business, Vol. 2, Issue 3.

5. Cordoș, G.S., & Fulop, M.T. (2015). New audit reporting challenges: auditioning the going concern basis of accounting. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 32.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3