Affiliation:
1. Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (Udine) , Udine Italia
2. Dipartimento di Area Medica, Università degli Studi di Udine , Udine Italia
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The research capacity of nurses has been reported to be still constrained in several countries, and not fully implemented in its potentiality due to a large number of factors. Despite its relevance both for clinical and public health purposes, no summary has been compiled to date regarding factors influencing the research capacity in the Italian context. Therefore, the primary aim of this review was to identify the barriers and enablers of conducting research as perceived by Italian nurses.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review. The following databases have been searched: ILISI ® (Indice della Letteratura Italiana di Scienze Infermieristiche) MEDLINE-via PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Ovid, Open Grey, Google Scopus, and Web of Science. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria.
Results
The studies were mainly descriptive, with two quasi-experimental. A total of seven barriers and four facilitators of conducting research among Italian nurses were identified. The constraints were poor English knowledge, technology and library availability and accessibility, understaffing and lack of time, nursing culture characteristics, lack of nursing leadership support, scarce funding availability, and the bureaucratic ethical committee process. The facilitators were nursing journal reading, expert research team support, university and hospital partnerships, and international cooperation.
Conclusions
Given the small number and the high heterogeneity of the emerged studies, this systematic review provides an initial framework for the constraints that prevent, and the strategies that promote, Italian nurses’ participation/conducting of research projects that could inform policies in this field.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference29 articles.
1. Hegge M. Nightingale’s environmental theory. Nurs Sci Q. 2013;26:2119. doi: 10.1177/0894318413489255.
2. Martini M, Lippi D. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and the teaching of Ignaz Semmelweis and Florence Nightingale: a lesson of public health from history, after the “introduction of handwashing” (1847). J Prev Med Hyg. 2021;62:E621-e4. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.3.2161.
3. Davies R. The Bologna process: the quiet revolution in nursing higher education. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28:935-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.008.
4. Giacomello M, Canova C, Zanotti R. Contribution of Italian nursing professors to international Literature: 2000 - 2016 review. Nurs Outlook. 2019;67:476-85. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.02.011.
5. Sasso L, Watson R, Barisone M, Pellegrini R, Timmins F, Aleo G, et al. The contribution of nursing doctoral schools to the development of evidence 10 years after their establishment in Italy: an exploratory descriptive survey of former and current doctoral students’ publications. Nurs Open. 2019;6:745-53. doi: 10.1002/nop2.262.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献