Primary care system factors and clinical decision-making in patients that could have lung cancer: A vignette study in five balkan region countries

Author:

Petek Davorina1,Assenova Radost2,Foreva Gergana3,Babić Svjetlana Gašparović4,Šter Marija Petek1,Prebil Nuša1,Puia Aida5,Smyrnakis Emmanouil6,Harris Michael78

Affiliation:

1. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine , Poljanski nasip 58, 1000 Ljubljana , Slovenia

2. Department of Urology and General Medicine, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv , Plovdiv Bulgaria

3. Medical Center BROD , Plovdiv , Bulgaria

4. Croatian Health Insurance Fund , Rijeka , Croatia

5. Family Medicine Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj-Napoca , Romania

6. Laboratory of Primary Health Care, General Practice and Health Services Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki , Greece

7. College of Medicine & Health, University of Exeter , Exeter , UK

8. Institute of Primary Health Care Bern (BIHAM), University of Bern , Bern Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, with wide variations in national survival rates. This study compares primary care system factors and primary care practitioners’ (PCPs’) clinical decision-making for a vignette of a patient that could have lung cancer in five Balkan region countries (Slovenia, Croatia, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania). Methods PCPs participated in an online questionnaire that asked for demographic data, practice characteristics, and information on health system factors. Participants were also asked to make clinical decisions in a vignette of a patient with possible lung cancer. Results The survey was completed by 475 PCPs. There were significant national differences in PCPs’ direct access to investigations, particularly to advanced imaging. PCPs from Bulgaria, Greece, and Romania were more likely to organise relevant investigations. The highest specialist referral rates were in Bulgaria and Romania. PCPs in Bulgaria were less likely to have access to clinical guidelines, and PCPs from Slovenia and Croatia were more likely to have access to a cancer fast-track specialist appointment system. The PCPs’ country had a significant effect on their likelihood of investigating or referring the patient. Conclusions There are large differences between Balkan region countries in PCPs’ levels of direct access to investigations. When faced with a vignette of a patient with the possibility of having lung cancer, their investigation and referral rates vary considerably. To reduce diagnostic delay in lung cancer, direct PCP access to advanced imaging, availability of relevant clinical guidelines, and fast-track referral systems are needed.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3