Standardization of quality of diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes (Q-DIO) measurement instrument for use in Slovenia

Author:

Gruden Maja Klančnik12,Müller-Staub Maria345,Pajnkihar Majda1,Štiglic Gregor16

Affiliation:

1. University of Maribor, Faculty of Health Sciences , Žitna ulica 15 , Maribor , Slovenia

2. University Medical Centre Ljubljana , Zaloška 2 , Ljubljana Slovenia

3. Institute of Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences , Groningen , the Netherlands

4. Pflege PBS, Obere Hofbergstrasse , Wil , Switzerland

5. Stadtspital Waid , Tièchestrasse 99 , Zürich , Switzerland

6. University of Maribor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer , Maribor , Slovenia

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To describe the cross-cultural adaptation of the Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) Instrument into the Slovene language. Methods Based on general international guidelines, a six-step process of localization to translate and adjust the instrument from English into the Slovene language was used. Content validity was quantified based on an agreement of eight experts. The instrument was tested using a sample of 140 nursing documentations from two Slovenian tertiary hospitals. Results 26 of 29 items showed an excellent content validity index ranging from 0.857 to 1.000, and a modified kappa index above 0.856. The content validity indexes of the three remaining items adjusted based on experts’ comments were subsequently estimated at 1.000. Construct validity was significantly different between the two groups of documentations. The Cronbach coefficient for the whole questionnaire was 0.860. Cronbach’s alpha if item deleted reamins above 0.80 for all items. The criteria for the difficulty grades of items and discrimination validity were acceptably met for more than 75% of items. Conclusion Based on the results of the study, it may be concluded that Q-DIO is a reliable instrument for measuring the quality of nursing documentation. The deviations in the results of some items are due to poor nursing documentation quality, and indicate that nursing classifications have not yet been fully implemented into practice in the study setting. Additional testing of the instrument is recommended.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference31 articles.

1. Taylor L, LeMone L. Fundamentals of nursing: the art and science of nursing care. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Walters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.

2. Perry AG, Potter P, Ostendorf W. Clinical nursing skills and techniques. 9th ed. St. Luis: Elsevier, 2018.

3. Blair W, Smith B. Nursing documentation: frameworks and barriers. Contemp Nurse. 2012;41(2): 160–8. doi: 10.5172/conu.2012.41.2.160.

4. Duclos-Miller PA. Improving nursing documentation and reducing risk. Brentwood: HCPro, 2016.

5. Petkovšek-Gregorin R, Skela-Savič B. Stališča medicinskih sester o pomembnosti dokumentiranja v zdravstveni negi. Obzor Zdrav Neg. 2015;49(2):106-25. doi: 10.14528/snr.2015.49.2.50.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3