2L of Polyethylene Glycol as the Main Small Bowel Cleansing Regimen Component Prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: Interim Analysis
-
Published:2020-04-01
Issue:2
Volume:74
Page:83-87
-
ISSN:2255-890X
-
Container-title:Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Derovs Aleksejs123, Derova Jeļena13, Kleina Regīna1, Pokrotnieks Juris14
Affiliation:
1. Rīga Stradiņš University , 16 Dzirciema Str., Rīga , LV- 1007 , Latvia 2. Rīga East University Hospital , 2 Hipokrāta Str., Rīga , LV- 1038 , Latvia 3. Latvian Maritime Medical Centre , 27 Patversmes Str., Rīga , LV- 1005 , Latvia 4. Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital , Rīga , Latvia
Abstract
Abstract
Capsule Enteroscopy (CE) is a fundamentally new method in diagnostic endoscopy. However, there are several factors influencing the quality of this procedure, including impermeable fluids, food remains etc. The aim of the study was to assess one of the most popular currently used bowel preparation methods and evaluate possible effects of various factors. 136 CE examinations were analysed. Each patient was prepared using 2 litres of polyethylene glycol (PEG) one day prior to examination. There was a special form filled in for each patient, which included relevant parameters (anamnesis, CE data etc.). Of 136 CE cases, 84 (61.8%) were female patients and 52 (38.2%) were male. The small bowel (SB) transit time in 112 patients varied from 39 to 502 minutes, but in 24 cases the capsule did not reach caecum. The degree of bowel cleanliness was as follows: very good — 30 (22.1%) patients, satisfactory — 97 (71.3%), and poor — 9 (6.6%). A positive correlation was observed between the degree of SB cleanliness and the SB transit time (p = 0.015). A longer SB transits time was associated with poor SB cleanliness. The results obtained in this study showed that the quality of SB cleanliness is affected by SB transit time. A relatively large percentage of cases rated as satisfactory bowel cleanliness and comparatively small percentage of bowel cleanliness cases rated as “very good” were observed when 2 litres of PEG were used prior to CE, indicating an important issues in preparation of the bowel prior to CE.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference25 articles.
1. Adler, S. N., Farkash, S., Sompolinsky, Y., Gafanovich, I., Goldin, E., Bar-Gil Shitrit, A. (2017). A novel purgative protocol for capsule endos-copy of the small bowel produces better quality of visibility than 2l of PEG: Timing is of the essence. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J., 5 (4), 485–490. 2. Albert, J., Gobcl, C. M., Lesske, J., Lotterer, E., Nietsch, H., Fleig, W. E. (2004). Simethicone for small bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy: A systematic, single-blinded, controlled study. Gastrointest. Endosc., 4 (4), 487–491 3. Ben-Soussan, E., Savoye, G., Antonietti, M., Ramirez, S., Ducrotte, P., Lerebours, E. (2005). Is a 2-liler PEG preparation useful before capsule endoscopy? J. Clin. Gastroenterol., 39, 381–384. 4. Chen, H. B., Lian-Xiang, P., Yue, H., Chun, H., Shu-Ping, X., Rong-Pang, L., Xiao-Zong, W., Xiao-Lin, L. (2017). Randomized controlled trial of 3 days fasting and oral senna, combined with mannitol and simethicone, before capsule endoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore), 96 (43), e8322. 5. Costamagna, G., Shah, S. K., Riccioni, M. E., Foschia, F., Mutignani, M., Perri, V., Vecchioli, A., Brizi, M. G., Picciochi, A., Marano, P. (2002). A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and videocapsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology, 123, 999–1005.
|
|