Gut Microbiome Differences Regarding Lifestyle and the History of COVID-19 Disease in Ulcerative Colitis Patients
-
Published:2024-08-01
Issue:4
Volume:78
Page:266-274
-
ISSN:2255-890X
-
Container-title:Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Straume Zane12, Krūmiņa Nikola2, Elbere Ilze3, Rozenberga Maija3, Blomniece Laura2, Erts Renārs4, Rudzīte Dace5, Kloviņš Jānis3, Krūmiņa Angelika6
Affiliation:
1. Rīga East Clinical University Hospital , Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Clinic , 2 Hipokrāta Str ., Rīga , Latvia 2. Department of Internal Diseases , Rīga Stradiņš University , 16 Dzirciema Str ., Rīga , , Latvia 3. Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre , 1 Rātsupītes Str ., Rīga , , Latvia 4. Faculty of Medicine , University of Latvia , 3 Jelgavas Str., Rīga , , Latvia 5. Laboratory “Gaiļezers” , Rīga East Clinical University Hospital , 2 Hipokrāta Str ., Rīga , , Latvia 6. Department of Infectology , Rīga Stradiņš University , 16 Dzirciema Str ., Rīga , , Latvia
Abstract
Abstract
The microbiome’s role in ulcerative colitis pathogenesis is established. The influence of lifestyle on gut microbiome composition remains unclear, and interplay with COVID-19 disease warrants investigation. In a cross-sectional study conducted from June to December 2021, 49 outpatients from Rīga East Clinical University Hospital were included. Patients were categorised based on COVID-19 disease status (positive vs. negative) within the preceding six months. Lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, stress levels, and dietary patterns) were assessed and evaluated. Taxonomic classification of gut microbiome metagenome data was performed using MetaPhlAn v.2.6.0, with subsequent analysis conducted using SPSS 20.0. Thirty-one (63%) were male, and 18 (37%) were female patients. Fourteen patients (28.6%) tested positive for COVID-19. Gut microbiome composition differences were not observed between COVID-19 disease groups. Twenty-four (49%) patients engaged in sports activities and 30 (61.2%) patients reported a history of smoking. No significant microbiome differences were observed in groups regarding physical activity or smoking. Thirty-five (71.4%) were alcohol users, for whom Firmicutes abundance was significantly higher compared to non-users, p = 0.041. Patients reporting lower stress levels (18, 36.7%) exhibited higher Actinobacteria abundance compared to those with higher stress levels (31, 63.3%), p = 0.03. COVID-19 disease status did not affect gut microbiome composition, alcohol consumption and stress levels demonstrated significant associations.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference54 articles.
1. Abbas, N., Shakil, M., Akhtar Rana, Z., Basharat Ali, S., Ayub Awan, A., Gul, S. (2023). A systematic review of the role of diet in ulcerative colitis. Cureus, 15 (5), e39350. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39350. 2. Abegunde, A. T., Muhammad, B. H., Bhatti, O., Ali, T. (2016). Environmental risk factors for inflammatory bowel diseases: Evidence based literature review. World J. Gastroenterol., 22 (27), 6296. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i27.6296. 3. Alam, M. T., Amos, G. C. A., Murphy, A. R. J., Murch, S., Wellington, E. M. H., Arasaradnam, R. P. (2020). Microbial imbalance in inflammatory bowel disease patients at different taxonomic levels. Gut Pathogens, 12 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-019-0341-6. 4. Belizário, J. E., Napolitano, M. (2015). Human microbiomes and their roles in dysbiosis, common diseases, and novel therapeutic approaches. Frontiers Microbiol., 6, 1050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01050. 5. Benjamin, J. L., Hedin, C. R. H., Koutsoumpas, A., Ng, S. C., McCarthy, N. E., Prescott, N. J., Pessoa-Lopes, P., Mathew, C. G., Sanderson, J., Hart, A. L., Kamm, M. A., Knight, S. C., Forbes, A., Stagg, A. J., Lindsay, J. O., Whelan, K. (2012). Smokers with active Crohn’s disease have a clinically relevant dysbiosis of the gastrointestinal microbiota. Inflamm. Bowel Dis., 18 (6), 1092–1100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21864.
|
|