Genetic Diversity and Relatedness of Latvian Pyrus Germplasm assessed by a Set of SSR Markers
-
Published:2022-08-01
Issue:4
Volume:76
Page:438-447
-
ISSN:2255-890X
-
Container-title:Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Lācis Gunārs1, Kota-Dombrovska Irita1, Kārkliņa Katrīna1, Lāce Baiba1
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Horticulture , 1 Graudu Str., Dobele , , Latvia
Abstract
Abstract
Pears (Pyrus communis L.) are not native plant species in Latvia but have a long history of introduction and growing, using various sources of plant material over time. Therefore, the existing collection of genetic resources combines accessions of different origin. To plan the further development of this crop and to ensure its successful preservation, this study aimed to characterise the Latvian Pyrus germplasm collection using SSR molecular markers and to estimate the level of genetic diversity within the pear germplasm collection. Six SSR markers were used to genotype 206 pear accessions of different origin, such as cultivars and hybrids bred in Latvia, landraces collected during expeditions throughout the country, and introduced foreign cultivars. The marker set identified 197 accessions with unique genotypes, and enabled a comparison of different origin groups, and an assessment of genetic diversity. Allele numbers ranged from 15 to 28 for the markers used, whereas observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.519 to 0.956. Grouping of accessions according to geographical origin was not observed. However, the genetic background of Latvian samples was entirely in alignment with international germplasm.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference50 articles.
1. Alonso Segura, J., M., Espiau Ramírez, M. T., Pina Sobrino, A., Rubio-Cabetas, M. J., Fernández i Martí, Á. (2021). Genetic diversity of the Spanish Pear Germplasm Collection assessed by SSRs. Acta Hortic., 1303, 37–44. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.6.10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.6 2. Ali, S. H., Othman, H. E., Zibari, P. A., A., Jubrael, J. M. S. (2018). Evaluation of genetic variations and phylogeny of the most popular pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivars in Duhok city using AFLP markers. Innovaciencia, 6 (1), 1–10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/2346075X.46110.15649/2346075X.461 3. Asanidze, Z., Akhalkatsi, M., Henk, A. D., Richards, C. M., Volk, G. M. (2014). Genetic relationships between wild progenitor pear (Pyrus L.) species and local cultivars native to Georgia, South Caucasus. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants, 209 (9), 504–512. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2014.06.01310.1016/j.flora.2014.06.013 4. Baccichet, I., Foria, S., Messina, R., Peccol, E., Losa, A., Fabro, M., Gori, G., Zandigiacomo, P., Cipriani, G., Testolin, R. (2020). Genetic and ploidy diversity of pear (Pyrus spp.) germplasm of Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 67 (1), 83–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00856-9. 5. Bassil, N., Postman, J., D. (2010). Identification of European and Asian pears using EST-SSRs from Pyrus. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 57 (3), 357–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-009-9474-7
|
|