Morphological and Anatomical Juvenility Markers in Silver Birch (Betula pendula Roth) In Vitro Shoots
-
Published:2024-06-01
Issue:3
Volume:78
Page:191-196
-
ISSN:2255-890X
-
Container-title:Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Girgžde Elva1, Samsone Ineta1, Krivmane Baiba1, Gailis Arnis1, Ruņģis Dainis1
Affiliation:
1. Latvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava”, 111 Rīgas Str., Salaspils, LV-2169 , Latvia
Abstract
Abstract
During plant development, woody plants progress from a juvenile phase to the reproductive mature phase. This process is marked by morphological, physiological, and biochemical changes, including loss of competence to vegetative reproduction. During in vitro stabilisation, mature tissues undergo rejuvenation, however, the exact degree of juvenility attained is not known and differing regeneration capabilities are observed between genotypes. Markers indicating juvenility state would assist the in vitro rejuvenation process and increase the efficiency of successful micropropagation. Several leaf and stem morphological and anatomical traits were analysed as possible juvenility markers in mature and rejuvenated silver birch in vitro shoots. The results showed that juvenility state of birch in vitro shoots varies between different genotypes and between plants from the same genotype. Mature birch in vitro shoots had approximately two times larger and thicker leaves compared to rejuvenated and juvenile shoots. Stem radius, including cortex, phloem, xylem and pith width as well as phloem width : stem radius and phloem width : xylem width ratio was significantly larger in mature shoots. Periderm development and loss of rooting ability were observed in mature shoots. These anatomical and morphological traits could be used as possible juvenility/maturation markers.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference28 articles.
1. Ballester, A., San-José, M. C., Vidal, N., Fernandez-Lorenzo, J. L., Vieitez, A. M. (1999). Anatomical and biochemical events during in vitro rooting of microcuttings from juvenile and mature phases of chesnut. Ann. Bot., 83, 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0865. 2. Bastías, A., Almada, R., Rojas, P., Donoso, J. M., Hinrichsen, P., Sagredo, B. (2016). Aging gene pathway of microRNAs 156/157 and 172 is altered in juvenile and adult plants from in vitro propagated Prunus sp. Ciencia e investigación agraria 43 (3), 429–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202016000300009. 3. Brand, M. H., Lineberger, R. D. (1992). In vitro rejuvenation of Betula (Betulaceae): Morphological evaluation. Amer. J. Bot., 79 (6), 618–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb14603.x. 4. Braune, W., Leman, A., Taubert, H. (1999). Pflanzenanatomisches Praktikum I [Plant anatomy practicum I]. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag Heidelberg, Berlin. 368 pp. (in German). 5. Brus, D., Hengeveld, G. M., Walvoort, D. J. J., Goedhart, P. W., Heidema, A. H., Nabuurs, G. J., Gunia, K. (2012). Statistical mapping of tree species over Europe. Eur. J. Forest Res., 131, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0513-5.
|
|