Sapropel – Mining Characteristics and Potential Use in Medicine
-
Published:2022-04-01
Issue:2
Volume:76
Page:188-197
-
ISSN:2255-890X
-
Container-title:Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Vanadziņš Ivars1, Mārtiņsone Inese1, Kļaviņa Aneka1, Komarovska Laura1, Auce Agris1, Dobkeviča Linda1, Sprūdža Dagmāra1
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Occupational Safety and Environmental Health , Rīga Stradiņš University , 16 Dzirciema Str ., Rīga , , Latvia
Abstract
Abstract
Found in lakes, freshwater sapropel is a sediment with a fine structure containing more than 10% of organic matter as well as residues of aquatic organisms with a small content of inorganic components of biogenic origin and mixture of mineral ingredients. The mud was first used in medicine by ancient Greeks, and it gained more popularity together with development of balneology in Europe in the 19th century as a remedy for several diseases. The last century also brought wider popularity in its cosmetic use. Despite its wide usage, mechanisms behind its effects are not so clear yet. Broad but fragmented studies on the effects of sapropel are available, but few have used modern research methods. There is evidence suggesting that its positive health effects are linked to its thermal capacity, ability of penetration in tissues and biological activity of its components, e.g., humic substances. Evidence also suggests antimicrobial activity and positive effects on skin regeneration. This review aims at summarising available knowledge on the structure and composition of sapropel and its effects on the human body, as well as its potential for further evidence-based use in medicine and cosmetics.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference67 articles.
1. Anderson, R. (1996). Seasonal sedimentation: A framework for reconstructing climatic and environmental change. Special Publications (Geological Society, London), 116, 1–15. DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.116.01.02.10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.116.01.02 2. Badalov, N. G., Krikorova, S. A. (2012). Peloid therapy: The theoretical and practical aspects, problems and prospects of its development [Бадалов Н.Г., Крикорова С.А. Грязелечение: теория, практика, проблемы и перспективы развития.] Vopr. Kurortol. Fizioter. Lech. Fiz. Kult., 3, 50–54 (in Russian). 3. Basili, S., Martini, F., Ferroni, P., Grassi, M., Sili Scavalli, A., Streva, P., Cusumano, G., Musca, A., Battista Rini, G. (2001). Effects of mud-pack treatment on plasma cytokine and soluble adhesion molecule levels in healthy volunteers. Clin. Chim. Acta, 314 (1–2). 209–214.10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00697-0 4. Becker, B. E. (1994). The biologic aspects of hydrotherapy. J. Back Musculoskel. Rehabil., 4, 255–264.10.3233/BMR-1994-4405 5. Bellometti, S., Cecchettin, M., Lalli, A., Galzigna, L. (1996). Mud-pack treatment increases serum antioxidant defences in osteoarthrosic patients. Biomed. Pharmacother., 50 (1), 37. DOI: 10.1016/0753-3322(96)85097-910.1016/0753-3322(96)85097-9
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|