Affiliation:
1. the director of Active Society Foundation , Budapest , Hungary
Abstract
Abstract
The author tries to investigate the thoughts and politics in literature about international circular migration in the lights of European Union (EU) initiatives related to Visegrad Four Countries (V4) with special attention to Hungary. The cross-border circular flows have become relatively frequent during life stages of people differentiated by previous migratory experiences, and next aspirations. The popularity of international circular migration erected from the hypothesis of ’triple win solution’ without any empirical verifications. Basically, two sorts of circular migration system exist: homogenous and heterogenous. The homogenous human circular migration system consists of the same kind of moves with similar time rhythm from statistical angles. It seems to us that the practice of life-long international circular migration characterises few long-term circulators. However, the heterogenous circular migration systems combine with other spatial mobility forms function during whole individual life cycle due to one of the symptoms of human beings. The main aim of the contribution is to explore some elements of similar ideas and politics on international circulatory flows interfered between Western and Eastern Europe. Moreover, we propose some old-new innovative solutions for V4 to reform the rigid EU migration policies.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference73 articles.
1. Ágh, Attila (2019): The neoliberal hybrid in East -Central Europe. The ‘treason of intellectuals’ and its current re -assessment. Politics in Central Europe 15(3): 355–381.10.2478/pce-2019-0021
2. Bauerová, Helena (2018): Migration Policy of the V4 in the context of migration crisis. Politics in Central Europe 14(2): 99–120.10.2478/pce-2018-0011
3. Bleha, Branislav and Sprocha, Branislav (2020): Trends in demography and migration in Slovakia, in Tálas, Péter – Etl, Alex eds. Demography and migration in Central and Eastern Europe. 143–155, Dialóg Campus.
4. Bódis, Gábor – Michalkó, Gábor (2017): Jöttünk, láttunk, visszatérünk: a visszatérő turisztikai forgalom. (We came, we saw, we return: the repetitive tourist mobility.) Területi Statisztika 57(3): 294–310.
5. Cabada, Ladislav (2020): Central Europe between the West and East: independent region, the bridge, buffer zone or ‘eternal’ semi -periphery? Politics in Central Europe 16(2): 419–432.10.2478/pce-2020-0018