A New Perspective on Poland’s Policy towards Russia in 2005–2007: a Middle Power Attempts to Engage a Rising Major Power

Author:

Antonovič Marijuš1

Affiliation:

1. PhD student and lecturer at Vilnius University’s Institute of International Relations and Political Science .

Abstract

Abstract Scholars of middle powers have been trying to solve its definitional issues and some progress has been made in the systemic approach. This article shows that further advancement may be gained by employing neoclassical realism in studying middle powers’ foreign policy behaviour. This done by analysing Poland’s policy towards Russia in 2005–2007. It is widely accepted in academic literature that Poland in 2005–2007, during the rule of the Law and Justice Party, pursued a confrontational policy towards Russia. However, this article challenges such widespread views. It demonstrates that Poland’s policy towards Russia was actually simultaneously based on balancing and engagement. Using a neoclassical realist framework and data gathered from interviews with Poland’s main foreign policymakers at that time, this article shows that the balancing was caused by the power asymmetry and differing interests between Russia and Poland, whereas the engagement – by the Polish policymakers’ attempts to influence Russia’s intentions towards Poland and by their perceived situation in the European balance of power.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference47 articles.

1. Acharya, Amitav (1999): Containment, Engagement or Counter -Dominance? Malaysia’s response to the rise of China, in Johnston, Alastair I. – Ross, Robert S., ed., Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power. 132–154, Routledge, New York.

2. Antonovič, Marijuš (2018): Studies in Poland’s Foreign Policy: the case of Poland–Russia Relations. Warsaw East European Review 8: 123–133.

3. Barkin, Jack S. (2003): Realist Constructivism. International Studies Review 5(3): 325–342.

4. Bleich, Erik – Pekkanen, Robert (2013): How to Report Interview Data, in Mosley, Layna, ed., Interview Research in Political Science. 84–105, Cornell University Press, Ithaca & London.

5. Carr, Andrew (2014): Is Australia a middle power? A systemic impact approach. Australian Journal of International Affairs 68(1): 70–84.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Like knows like? Arms trade between South Korea and Poland;Cambridge Review of International Affairs;2024-08-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3