Differences in Agricultural Support between Countries – The OECD Measurement

Author:

Gendová Ruzsíková Kristína1

Affiliation:

1. Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra , Slovak Republic

Abstract

Abstract Countries provide different levels of support from public expenditures to farmers. Some countries subsidise their agricultural producers more significantly. On the other hand, other group of countries provides less support to their producers from public resources. Different international organisations and institutions provide their own indicators as in the case of the Oranisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The OECD provides a comprehensive framework to measure the level of support and to identify its structure. This measurement provides a comparable review of support to agriculture from public budgets and helps to evaluate the transfers from taxpayers to producers or consumers. The aim of our work was to present this measurement framework, the differences in support between OECD and some non-OECD countries and to see if there is an evidence of development in level and/or in structure of supports in agriculture in the 2016, 2017 and 2018’s editions of OECD publications taken into consideration. The comparative analysis shows that not only the level, but the composition of support differes from country to country.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference14 articles.

1. BIELIK, P. – JURÍČEK, P. – KUNOVÁ, D. 2007. The comparison of agricultural support policies in the OECD and the EU countries from the perspective of economic globalization processes. In Agricultural Economics – Czech, 2007, no. 53, pp. 339–348.

2. BOJNEC, Š. – FERTŐ, I. 2019. Do CAP subsidies stabilise farm income in Hungary and Slovenia? In Agricultural Economics – Czech, 2019, no. 65, pp. 103–111.

3. BROOKS, J. – DYER, G. – TAYLOR, E. 2008. The Policy Evaluation Model (PEM), In Modelling Agricultural Trade and Policy Impacts in Less Developed Countries, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, Paris : OECD Publishing, 2008, no. 11.

4. CZYZEWSKI, B. – SMEDZIK-AMBROZY, K. 2017. The regional structure of the CAP subsidies and the factor productivity in agriculture in the EU 28. In Agricultural Economics – Czech, 2017, no. 63, pp. 149–163.

5. MARTINI, R. 2011. Long Term Trends in Agricultural Impacts, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, no. 45, Paris : OECD Publishing, 2011-04-01. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kgdp5zw179-en10.1787/5kgdp5zw179-en

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3