Affiliation:
1. Dept. Of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering,University of Southern California . Los Angeles , CA , USA
Abstract
Abstract
The human musculoskeletal system is highly complex mechanically. Its neural control must deal successfully with this complexity to perform the diverse, efficient, robust and usually graceful behaviors of which humans are capable. Most of those behaviors might be performed by many different subsets of its myriad possible states, so how does the nervous system decide which subset to use? One solution that has received much attention over the past 50 years would be for the nervous system to be fundamentally limited in the patterns of muscle activation that it can access, a concept known as muscle synergies or movement primitives. Another solution, based on engineering control methodology, is for the nervous system to compute the single optimal pattern of muscle activation for each task according to a cost function. This review points out why neither appears to be the solution used by humans. There is a third solution that is based on trial-and-error learning, recall and interpolation of sensorimotor programs that are good-enough rather than limited or optimal. The solution set acquired by an individual during the protracted development of motor skills starting in infancy forms the basis of motor habits, which are inherently low-dimensional. Such habits give rise to muscle usage patterns that are consistent with synergies but do not reflect fundamental limitations of the nervous system and can be shaped by training or disability. This habit-based strategy provides a robust substrate for the control of new musculoskeletal structures during evolution as well as for efficient learning, athletic training and rehabilitation therapy.
Subject
Physiology (medical),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Reference111 articles.
1. Albert, M. V., Catz, N., Thier, P., & Kording, K. (2012). Saccadic gain adaptation is predicted by the statistics of natural fluctuations in oculomotor function. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6. doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00096
2. Asatryan, D. G., & Feldman, A. G. (1965). Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of posture. I. Mechanographic analysis of the work of the joint on execution of a postural task. Biofizika, 10, 925-935.
3. Athans, M., & Falb, P. L. (1966). Optimal control. New York: McGraw Hill.
4. Barradas, V. R., Kutch, J. J., Kawase, T., Koike, Y., & Schweighofer, N. (2020). When 90% of the variance is not enough: residual EMG from muscle synergy extraction influences task performance. Journal of Neurophysiology, 123, 2180-2190. doi:10.1152/jn.00472.2019
5. Bernstein, N. A. (1967). Human Motor Actions: Bernstein Reassessed (Translation, edited by Whiting, H.T.A.): Elsevier.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献