Affiliation:
1. Department of Environmental Geography, Institute of Geonics , The Czech Academy of Sciences , Brno , Czech Republic
2. Department of Geography, Faculty of Science , Palacký University Olomouc , Czech Republic
Abstract
Abstract
New empirical evidence regarding theories of the resource curse and regional resilience in the context of energy transitions is presented in this article. Our analysis aimed to answer the questions of what the principal differences are between coal mining and other regions in the Czech Republic, and what are the determinants of population decline, unemployment and populism as some of the key indicators of socioeconomic transformation. Unlike most current European studies focusing on NUTS2 or NUTS3 regions, we deal with data for districts (LAU1). The analysis revealed that (in aggregate) coal mining and post-mining districts are worse off in terms of air quality, population vitality, labour market and social capital indicators. It would be problematic for policy implications to consider coal mining and post-mining districts as homogenous categories, however, since there are significant inter-group and intra-group differences in most indicators. Coal mining itself and its decline did not prove to be a direct determinant of population loss, unemployment, and support for populism. The factors significantly affecting these phenomena are geographical (peripherality, urbanisation, population density) and socioeconomic (education level, business activity). In this respect, a provocative question is offered: to what extent is it effective and sustainable to economically support coal mining regions in their existing industrial production structures and population scales, and whether the current processes of reterritorialisation and depopulation can be considered a natural process. The fact that coal mining districts are at the forefront in the implementation of wind energy may be seen as positive, but it raises questions about spatial concentration, and the environmental justice of renewable energy development.
Reference96 articles.
1. ABRAHAM, J. (2019): Just transitions in a dual labor market: Right wing populism and austerity in the German energiewende. Journal of Labor and Society, 22(3): 679–693.10.1111/wusa.12438
2. ABREU, M., JONES, C. (2021): The shadow of the Pithead: understanding social and political attitudes in former coal mining communities in the UK. Applied Geography, 131: 102448.10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102448
3. ALVES DIAS, P., KANELLOPOULOS, K., MEDARAC, H., ... & TZIMAS, E. (2018): EU coal regions: opportunities and challenges ahead.: Petten, The Netherlands, European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
4. BALTA-OZKAN, N., YILDIRIM, J., CONNOR, P. M. (2015): Regional distribution of photovoltaic deployment in the UK and its determinants: A spatial econometric approach. Energy Economics, 51: 417–429.10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.003
5. BARTON, A. (2013): Environmental mining limits in the North Bohemian Lignite Region. Envigogika, 8(4): 1–7.10.14712/18023061.418
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献