Affiliation:
1. 1 Senior Associate Prof., Research Centre for Pedagogy and Education, VIA University College , 8000 Aarhus C , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
In Danish early childhood education and care (ECEC), fun is often emphasised as a key pedagogical tool but is used rather unreflexively. While well-being and happiness have been studied in various ways, the potential of fun is not included in theoretical discussions regarding happiness and well-being, although most people identify having fun as a fundamental reason for being happy. A researcher and three student assistants spent six months in three ECEC settings with a focus on episodes characterised by fun and laughter. Participant observation and interviews were conducted. Empirical data illustrate how fun appears in ECEC as laughter, smiles, attentiveness, intensity and ecstasy. Fun arises momentarily in a sense of lightness and freedom, as a means of communication, in physical play, when rules and expectations are broken, in frivolous references to lower body functions and in experiences of excitement. Pedagogues use fun based on child sensitivity, improvisation, courage to let go of control, informality, energy and a sense of humour. Danish humour philosophy distinguishes between small humour and big humour. Pedagogues with the ability to practice big humour are preferred in order to establish an ECEC culture characterised by fun, laughter and episodes of small humour that promote well-being in children.
Reference47 articles.
1. Addyman, C., Fogelquist, C., Levakova, L., & Rees, S. (2018) social facilitation of laughter and smiles in preschool children. Frontiers in Psychology, 9,1048.
2. Austin, D., & Halpin, W. (1988). The embodiment of knowledge: A phenomenological approach to child care. Journal of Child Care, Special CYC-Online ISSUE, 1988, 7–16. https://cyc-net.org/cyc-online/cycol-0208-austinhalpin.html
3. Banas, J. A., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: four decades of research. Communication Education, 60, 115–144.
4. Ben-Arieh, A., & Frønes, I. (2011). Taxonomy for child well-being indicators: A framework for the analysis of the well-being of children. Childhood, 18(4), 460–476.
5. Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., & Korbin, J.E. (2014): Multifaceted concept of child well-being. In Ben-Arieh et al. (eds.), Handbook of child well-being. Theories, methods and policies in global perspective (pp. 1–27). Springer Netherlands.