Metacognition’s potential for Existentialism in classrooms

Author:

Ozturk Nesrin1

Affiliation:

1. 1 Ph.D., İzmir Democracy University , Faculty of Education Curriculum & Instruction department Üçkuyular mah . Gürsel Aksel bulvarı, No: 14 Karabağlar Izmir Turkey

Abstract

Abstract The instrumentality and standardization of education may be important for functioning in contemporary societies. However, reducing education to measurable competencies may result in the loss of human value. Indeed, education becomes real when it relates to the reality of individuals. Existentialist education focuses on students’ freedom and agency; however, it is criticized for not having coherent and convincing educational guides. This analytical comparison paper argues that the premises of Existentialism and the components of metacognition may interact. While metacognitive awareness and thinking for essence lays the ground for individuality and autonomy, metacognitive knowledge relates to self-knowledge and not accepting ready-made concepts through self-questioning and dialogic encounters. Also, metacognitive experiences might mimic existential crises where individuals engage in highly conscious thinking during which metacognitive knowledge and regulation simultaneously help the individual deal with failure or anxiety. During such experiences, metacognitive regulation might facilitate individuals’ free choices and responsible engagement when building the self or handling difficulties. In this sense, enhancing metacognition may help individuals’ transition to the existing phase by building adequate self-knowledge and regulating thinking. This paper, finally, describes a set of pedagogies for fostering metacognition that could potentially facilitate existential attitudes or behaviors in mainstream classrooms.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education

Reference52 articles.

1. Afflerbach, P., & Meuwissen, K. (2005). Middle school self-assessment. In S. Israel, C. C. Block, K. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning (pp. 141-164). Erlbaum.

2. Azarian, R. (2011). Potentials and limitations of comparative methods in social science. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(4), 113–125.

3. Baniwal, V. (2013). Existential philosophy of education: A Buberian response. Educationia Confab, 2(11), 18–26.

4. Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. Buber, M. (2017). Ben ve sen. Kopernik Kitap.

5. Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131–142.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3